Author
Listed:
- Antonio J. Vázquez Morejón
- Cristina Felipe González
- Manuel Alejandro Muñoz Caracuel
- Raquel Vázquez-Morejón
Abstract
Background: Studies examining the effects of incorporating patients’ preferences into treatment outcomes highlight their impact on crucial aspects such as reduced dropout rates and enhanced effectiveness. Recognizing individuals’ rights to participate in decisions about their treatments underscores the importance of studying treatment preferences and the factors influencing these choices. Aim: This study aims to identify treatment preferences (psychological, pharmacological, or combined) among a sample of patients and to discern the psychosocial and clinical factors influencing these preferences. Methods: A total of 2,133 individuals receiving care at a community mental health unit completed assessments on anxious-depressive symptoms, social and occupational adjustment, and their treatment preference. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS, with descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and one-way ANOVA applied. Results: Preferences for treatments were distributed as follows: Combined (49.8%), psychological (33%), and pharmacological (10.6%). Factors such as diagnosis, severity of depressive and anxious symptoms, and functional impact were related to treatment preference with a moderate effect size. Meanwhile, various sociodemographic factors correlated with the selected treatment, though with a weak effect size. Conclusions: There is a pronounced preference for combined treatments. The significance of psychological treatments is evident, as four out of five participants favored them in their choices. Addressing these preferences calls for an exploration within the broader context of prescription freedom in mental health.
Suggested Citation
Antonio J. Vázquez Morejón & Cristina Felipe González & Manuel Alejandro Muñoz Caracuel & Raquel Vázquez-Morejón, 2024.
"Psychosocial factors associated with treatment preference in mental health,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 70(4), pages 818-827, June.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:70:y:2024:i:4:p:818-827
DOI: 10.1177/00207640241236105
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:70:y:2024:i:4:p:818-827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.