IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v70y2024i4p792-800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Functional recovery in older adults with schizophrenia: A national interRAI study

Author

Listed:
  • Yoram Barak
  • S. Fatemeh Sajjadi
  • Linda Hobbs
  • Tess Patterson

Abstract

Background: The concept of recovery for people with schizophrenia (PwS) is still a matter of debate. Growing numbers of PwS living to older age calls for examination of their disease trajectories with a focus on recovery. Aim: To compare two groups of PwS (good wellbeing; poor wellbeing) on several psychosocial variables associated with social wellbeing to identify interventions that support functional recovery. Method: Data was drawn from participants from across New Zealand (NZ), who had received a formal diagnosis of Schizophrenia; were living independently in the community, and who had undergone their first International Resident Assessment Instrument (interRAI) assessment from 2012 to 2022. We compared two groups of PwS (good social wellbeing; poor social wellbeing) examining associations with demographic and psychosocial variables. Results: We compared interRAI assessments for: ‘poor psychosocial wellbeing’ ( n = 1,378; 67%; 56% female; 70.5% 65 years and over; 36.1% never married); and ‘good psychosocial wellbeing’ ( n = 693; 33%; 61.1% female; 78.1% 65 years and over; 29.8% never married; n = 549 did not have sufficient social wellbeing data to be included). We found significant associations between social wellbeing and depression, disruptive behaviour, decision making, self-expression, understanding verbal information, activity level, self-reported health and medication adherence. Logistical regression showed depression (β = .84, p

Suggested Citation

  • Yoram Barak & S. Fatemeh Sajjadi & Linda Hobbs & Tess Patterson, 2024. "Functional recovery in older adults with schizophrenia: A national interRAI study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 70(4), pages 792-800, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:70:y:2024:i:4:p:792-800
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640241230837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640241230837
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640241230837?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:70:y:2024:i:4:p:792-800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.