IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v69y2023i8p1856-1868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthcare professionals’ knowledge, confidence and attitudes in relation to psychosis care: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Jenny Chen
  • Sarira El-Den
  • Lily Pham
  • Claire L O’Reilly
  • Jack C Collins

Abstract

Background: Psychosis is a mental disorder that, despite its low prevalence, causes high disease and economic burden. Inadequate knowledge, lack of confidence and stigmatising attitudes of healthcare professionals (HCPs) may lead to suboptimal care. Aim: To review the literature exploring HCPs’ knowledge, confidence and attitudes in relation to psychosis care. Method: A systematic search was undertaken across three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO) using a search strategy encompassing the concepts: ‘healthcare professionals’, ‘knowledge, attitude, and confidence in care’ and ‘psychotic illnesses and symptoms’ to identify relevant records published from 1st January 2002 to 18th March 2022. Results were screened against predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria by title and abstract, followed by full text. Data were extracted into tables and synthesised narratively. Results: Initially, 7,397 studies were identified. Following two-stage screening, 24 studies were eligible for inclusion. Of these studies, 16 explored attitudes, four explored knowledge and attitudes, one explored knowledge, one explored confidence, one explored attitudes and confidence in care and one explored all three constructs. Most HCPs in the included studies demonstrated stigmatising attitudes towards people with psychosis. Furthermore, certain HCPs, including nurses and general practitioners, demonstrated low levels of knowledge, while psychiatrists, occupational therapists, psychologists and nurses had low levels of confidence in caring for people with psychosis. Conversely, positive attitudes were also observed in some HCPs resulting from having acquaintances with lived experience of psychosis. The need for additional education and training to improve HCPs’ knowledge and confidence in relation to caring for people living with psychosis was identified. Conclusions: Most attitudes identified were negative and stemmed from stigma, while some were positive due to HCPs’ compassion and familiarity with psychosis. The level of knowledge and confidence identified were mostly suboptimal, and so further research is required to develop and evaluate tailored interventions to address this gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenny Chen & Sarira El-Den & Lily Pham & Claire L O’Reilly & Jack C Collins, 2023. "Healthcare professionals’ knowledge, confidence and attitudes in relation to psychosis care: A systematic review," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 69(8), pages 1856-1868, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:69:y:2023:i:8:p:1856-1868
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640231194490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640231194490
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640231194490?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Horng Hien Wong & Shazana Shahwan & Swapna Verma & Mythily Subramaniam, 2019. "Case management in early psychosis intervention programme: perspectives of case managers," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 116-127, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:69:y:2023:i:8:p:1856-1868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.