IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v69y2023i7p1749-1767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-reported suicidal behaviours and associated factors in the general population of Latvia (2010–2018)

Author

Listed:
  • Krista Mieze
  • Anda Kivite-Urtane
  • Daiga Grinberga
  • Biruta Velika
  • Iveta Pudule
  • Elmars Rancans

Abstract

Background: Latvia has the second highest suicide rate in the European Union – with a total population age-standardized suicide rate of 16.1 per 100,000 inhabitants. Aims: We aimed to assess the prevalence of different types of self-reported suicidal behaviours in Latvia and determine the associated sociodemographic and health-related factors. Methods: This study was based on secondary data obtained from the Health Behaviour Among Latvian Adult Population survey. A representative sample of the general population was used, aged 15 to 64 years in 2010, 2012, 2014; and 15 to 74 years in 2016 and 2018 ( n  = 16,084). Respondents were asked to report the occurrence of life weariness, death wishes, suicidal ideation, suicidal plans and suicide attempts during the previous year. We assessed socio-demographics and health-related factors associated with suicidality. We performed univariate analysis and constructed stepwise multivariate logistic regression models. Results: In 2010 to 2018, 15.6% of responders reported some type of suicidal behaviour (95% CI [15.1, 16.2]). Sociodemographic factors – including non-cohabitation status and Latvian nationality – were associated with mild (life-weariness and death wishes) and serious (suicidal ideation, plans to commit suicide, suicide attempts) types of behaviour. Older age was associated with mild suicidal behaviours, whereas lower educational levels were associated with serious suicidal behaviours. Diagnosed depression, self-reported depression, self-reported anxiety, stress, low mood, alcohol intake habits with heavy drinking episodes (less than monthly, monthly and weekly), perceived health as average or below average, disuse of primary health services were associated with mild and serious types of suicidal behaviour. Current smoking status and absenteeism were associated with mild suicidal behaviour types. Self-reported insomnia, having at least two somatic diagnoses, occasional smoking status, absenteeism with 11 or more days in the last year, receiving disability pension were associated with serious suicidal behaviour types. Musculoskeletal diseases exhibited preventive effects. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that certain groups of individuals might exhibit greater vulnerability to suicidality.

Suggested Citation

  • Krista Mieze & Anda Kivite-Urtane & Daiga Grinberga & Biruta Velika & Iveta Pudule & Elmars Rancans, 2023. "Self-reported suicidal behaviours and associated factors in the general population of Latvia (2010–2018)," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 69(7), pages 1749-1767, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:69:y:2023:i:7:p:1749-1767
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640231174365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640231174365
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640231174365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yunna Kwan & Hye Sim Kim & Dae Ryong Kang & Tae Hui Kim, 2020. "Trend in the Prevalence of Non-Daily Smoking and Their Relationship with Mental Health Using the Korea Health and Nutrition Examination Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Vincent Lorant & Dharmi Kapadia & Julian Perelman & the DEMETRIQ study group, 2021. "Socioeconomic disparities in suicide: Causation or confounding?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:69:y:2023:i:7:p:1749-1767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.