IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v69y2023i6p1420-1431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does migrant workers’ subjective social status affect their mental health? Job satisfaction as a longitudinal mediator

Author

Listed:
  • Jingjing Zhou
  • Junwei Zhang
  • Meidi Chi
  • Wei Guo

Abstract

Background: Prior studies on migrant workers have explored the effect of their subjective social status and job satisfaction on their mental health, respectively or combined, as well as how their subjective social status affects their job satisfaction. Nonetheless, few have accounted straightforwardly and holistically for the mechanism of interaction between subjective social status, job satisfaction and mental health amongst migrant workers. Aims: Taking migrant workers in China as the object of study, we intended to probe the longitudinal links between their subjective social status, job satisfaction and mental health, in particular, their job satisfaction as a longitudinal mediator therein. Method: Using the three-wave data from the 2014, 2016 and 2018 China Labour-force Dynamics Survey, we defined migrant workers as labourers aged 15 to 64 with agricultural hukou and engaged in non-agricultural work in urban areas. The final valid sample comprised 2,035 individuals. Latent growth models (LGMs) were applied to test the hypothesised relationships. Results: The LGMs based on bootstrapping showed that amongst migrant workers the subjective social status, job satisfaction and mental health tended overall to grow linearly and that the job satisfaction longitudinally mediated between the subjective social status and mental health. Conclusions: The findings may enlighten policymaking to elevate migrant workers mentally and inform future studies on theoretical and practical fronts.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingjing Zhou & Junwei Zhang & Meidi Chi & Wei Guo, 2023. "Does migrant workers’ subjective social status affect their mental health? Job satisfaction as a longitudinal mediator," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 69(6), pages 1420-1431, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:69:y:2023:i:6:p:1420-1431
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640231164014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640231164014
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640231164014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:69:y:2023:i:6:p:1420-1431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.