Author
Listed:
- Julio Torales
- Anthon Daniel Torres-Romero
- MatÃas Franco Di Giuseppe
- ElÃas René Rolón-Méndez
- Patricia Lorena MartÃnez-López
- Katja Victoria Heinichen-Mansfeld
- Iván Barrios
- Marcelo O’Higgins
- José Almirón-Santacruz
- Osvaldo Melgarejo
- Noelia Ruiz DÃaz
- João Mauricio Castaldelli-Maia
- Antonio Ventriglio
Abstract
Background: Although technologies (including information, e-learning, and communication) have been daily employed by University students in the last years, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a considerable increase in their use. Technostress is a modern term referring to levels of stress caused by the prolonged exposure to technology. Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the technostress and related anxiety and depression among Paraguayan University students, describing their sociodemographic characteristics and relevant associations. Methods: A cross-sectional and descriptive study has been conducted. Participants were recruited through an Internet-based survey. Technostress, anxiety, and depression have been assessed with the Technostress Questionnaire (TechQ), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaire, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), respectively. Results: A total of 378 participants were included, 74.1% of whom were women. According to the TechQ scores, 47.4% of the participants reported a low/moderate level of technostress whereas 5.2% showed severe scores. About 58.5% of participants reported a GAD-7 score ⩾10, meeting diagnostic criteria for generalized anxiety. About 60.3% scored ⩾3 at the PHQ-2 reporting significant levels of depression. Technostress has been significantly associated with levels of anxiety ( p  
Suggested Citation
Julio Torales & Anthon Daniel Torres-Romero & MatÃas Franco Di Giuseppe & ElÃas René Rolón-Méndez & Patricia Lorena MartÃnez-López & Katja Victoria Heinichen-Mansfeld & Iván Barrios & Marcelo , 2022.
"Technostress, anxiety, and depression among university students: A report from Paraguay,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(5), pages 1063-1070, August.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:5:p:1063-1070
DOI: 10.1177/00207640221099416
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:5:p:1063-1070. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.