IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v68y2022i4p891-897.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stigma towards schizophrenia in Cyprus: Does studying a mental health related programme make a difference?

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Nikolaou
  • Eleni Petkari

Abstract

Background and aims: Students from mental health related programmes may display stigmatising attitudes towards people of schizophrenia, however there are no data available on this population in Cyprus. The purpose of the present study was (a) to examine the levels of contact and stigma towards schizophrenia in Cypriot students of programmes related to mental health and students of other programmes and (b) to examine whether the successful recognition of a person with schizophrenia through a vignette and the estimation of severity levels was related to stigmatising attitudes. Methods: The participants were undergraduate students purposively selected across Cypriot universities ( N  = 152). A vignette depicting a person with schizophrenia, followed by the OMI to examine stigma and the BAE to examine contact with mental illness were used to collect the data. Results: The results showed that studying a mental health related programme and being a man was associated with more positive views related to social integration. No further stigma dimensions were predicted by the included variables. Similarly, level of contact and being able to identify the mental condition and estimate its severity was not related to stigma. Conclusion: The results emphasise the need to develop educational interventions to tackle stigma across students independently of their study programme and enhance mental health related programmes with opportunities for structured contact with patients with mental illness.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Nikolaou & Eleni Petkari, 2022. "Stigma towards schizophrenia in Cyprus: Does studying a mental health related programme make a difference?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(4), pages 891-897, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:4:p:891-897
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640211010208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640211010208
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640211010208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:4:p:891-897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.