IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v68y2022i3p600-609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do carers of adolescents at first episode psychosis have distinctive psychological needs? A pilot exploration

Author

Listed:
  • Alice McKenna
  • Cassie M Hazell
  • Rowan Souray
  • Wenyi Cai
  • Lai Chu Man
  • Lucy Brown
  • Caroline Floyd
  • Natasha Lyons
  • Kaja Widuch
  • Gareth James
  • Debra Keay
  • Jonathan Souray
  • Roya Afsharzadegan
  • David Raune

Abstract

Background: Carers of patients experiencing first episode psychosis (FEP) are at an increased risk of mental and physical health problems themselves. However, little is known about how the psychological needs of carers may differ between those caring for an adolescent versus an adult who has FEP. Aims: This pilot study aimed to explore any differences in the psychological needs of carers caring for adolescents versus adults with FEP. Methods: We surveyed 254 carers of 198 FEP patients (34 carers of adolescents of 24 FEP adolescent patients). Carers completed self-report measures of anxiety, depression, burnout, subjective burden, coping, and key illness beliefs. The sample was divided according to whether the patient was under (adolescent) or over (adult) age 18, and analysed using mixed model logistic regressions. Results: Compared to the carers of adult patients, carers of adolescents were more than twice as likely (12% vs. 30%) to experience overall burnout syndrome (all three domains), and to develop it much quicker (19.4 vs. 10.1 months). They were also more likely to adopt behavioural disengagement avoidance as a form of coping. However, there was no difference between carers in terms of anxiety, depression, beliefs and subjective burden. For carers of adolescents, burnout was independently predicted by: a negative belief about the consequences of psychosis for the adolescent patient and an incoherent understanding of the patient’s mental health. Conclusions: If our findings can be replicated in a larger sample, then Rapid-Onset-Burnout-Syndrome (ROBS) is a particular problem in carers of adolescents at FEP, suggesting a need for routine screening and possible prophylactic intervention. Carers of adolescent’s use of behavioural escape coping maybe also require early intervention. Theoretically, consideration could be given to the development of an adolescent sub-branch to the cognitive model of caregiving.

Suggested Citation

  • Alice McKenna & Cassie M Hazell & Rowan Souray & Wenyi Cai & Lai Chu Man & Lucy Brown & Caroline Floyd & Natasha Lyons & Kaja Widuch & Gareth James & Debra Keay & Jonathan Souray & Roya Afsharzadegan , 2022. "Do carers of adolescents at first episode psychosis have distinctive psychological needs? A pilot exploration," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(3), pages 600-609, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:3:p:600-609
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764021992828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764021992828
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764021992828?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anvar Sadath & D. Muralidhar & Shivarama Varambally & Justin P. Jose & B. N. Gangadhar, 2015. "Family Intervention in First-Episode Psychosis," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saddam A. Hazaea & Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari & Saleh F. A. Khatib & Khaldoon Albitar & Jinyu Zhu, 2023. "Internal Auditing in the Arab World: A Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:3:p:600-609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.