IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v68y2022i1p166-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of family engagement in opioid assisted treatment: Results from a randomised controlled trial

Author

Listed:
  • Hamad Al Ghafri
  • Nael Hasan
  • Hesham Farouk Elarabi
  • Doa Radwan
  • Mansour Shawky
  • Samya Al Mamari
  • Tarek Abdelgawad
  • Abuelgasim El Rashid
  • Ayman Kodera
  • Helal Al Kathiri
  • Amanda J Lee
  • Shamil Wanigaratne

Abstract

Background: Family interventions in substance use disorders (SUD) treatment is limited despite the evidence for benefits. Providing family interventions is hampered by patient resistance, social stigma, logistics and factors related to the capacity of the treatment programmes. Aims: The purpose of the study was to examine the association between family engagement in treatment, and opioid use defined by percentage negative opioid screen and rate retention in treatment defined by completion of study period. Methods: Data from a 16-week outpatient randomised controlled trial (RCT) of 141 adults with opioid use disorder (OUD) receiving Opioid Assisted Treatment (OAT) using buprenorphine/naloxone film (BUP/NX-F) was, used to examine the association between family engagement in and opioid use and rate of retention in treatment. Multiple logistic regression was, applied to examine the independent prediction of family engagement on opioid use and rate retention in treatment. Results: Family engagement was significantly associated with retention in treatment (Spearman’s rho 0.25, p  

Suggested Citation

  • Hamad Al Ghafri & Nael Hasan & Hesham Farouk Elarabi & Doa Radwan & Mansour Shawky & Samya Al Mamari & Tarek Abdelgawad & Abuelgasim El Rashid & Ayman Kodera & Helal Al Kathiri & Amanda J Lee & Shamil, 2022. "The impact of family engagement in opioid assisted treatment: Results from a randomised controlled trial," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(1), pages 166-170, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:1:p:166-170
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764020979026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764020979026
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764020979026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:68:y:2022:i:1:p:166-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.