IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v67y2021i6p788-800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recovery-oriented intersectoral care between mental health hospitals and community mental health services: An integrative review

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Jørgensen
  • Tonie Rasmussen
  • Morten Hansen
  • Kate Andreasson

Abstract

Background: Recovery-oriented intersectoral care is described as an aim in mental healthcare to create a holistic framework for planning that provides integration of treatment and rehabilitation. Existing studies show that nurses and other professionals do not take responsibility for the collaborative element of intersectoral care between mental health hospitals and community mental health services. The users of mental healthcare do not experience their patient journey as a cohesive process when they are discharged from a mental health hospital to community mental health services. Aim: The integrative review aims to examine the professionals’ experience with recovery-oriented intersectoral care between mental health hospitals and community mental health services. Design: Since the aim was to review user experience, we chose an integrative review as an obvious choice for design. Ethical approval: Not applicable. Findings: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The interactive inductive and deductive analysis generated four themes, which clarify the experience of professionals with recovery-oriented intersectoral care between the mental health hospitals and community mental health services, namely ‘structurally routine care’, ‘unequal balance of power between the sectors’, ‘bureaucracy as a barrier to recovery-oriented intersectoral care’ and ‘flexible mental healthcare approaches’. Conclusion: This review achieves specific knowledge of recovery-oriented intersectoral care. The studies included show that recovery-oriented intersectoral care is not clearly defined. It is challenging to transfer intersectoral care to an organisation with different structural and linguistic barriers.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Jørgensen & Tonie Rasmussen & Morten Hansen & Kate Andreasson, 2021. "Recovery-oriented intersectoral care between mental health hospitals and community mental health services: An integrative review," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 67(6), pages 788-800, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:67:y:2021:i:6:p:788-800
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764020966634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764020966634
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764020966634?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim Jørgensen & Jeanette Praestegaard & Mari Holen, 2020. "The conditions of possibilities for recovery: A critical discourse analysis in a Danish psychiatric context," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(15-16), pages 3012-3024, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim Jørgensen & Morten Hansen & Bengt Karlsson, 2022. "Recovery-Oriented Practices in a Mental Health Centre for Citizens Experiencing Serious Mental Issues and Substance Use: As Perceived by Healthcare Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-12, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim Jørgensen & Mathias Hansen & Trine Groth Andersen & Morten Hansen & Bengt Karlsson, 2023. "Healthcare Professionals’ Experiences with Patient Participation in a Mental Healthcare Centre: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Trude Klevan & Rose-Marie Bank & Marit Borg & Bengt Karlsson & Vibeke Krane & Esther Ogundipe & Randi Semb & Mona Sommer & Rolf Sundet & Knut Tore Sælør & Siw Heidi Tønnessen & Hesook Suzie Kim, 2021. "Part I: Dynamics of Recovery: A Meta-Synthesis Exploring the Nature of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Recovery," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Kim Jørgensen & Mette Bonde Dahl & Jesper Frederiksen, 2020. "Healthcare Professionals’ and Users’ Experiences of Intersectoral Care between Hospital and Community Mental Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Kim Jørgensen & Tonie Rasmussen & Morten Hansen & Kate Andreasson & Bengt Karlsson, 2020. "Recovery-Oriented Intersectoral Care in Mental Health: As Perceived by Healthcare Professionals and Users," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Kim Jørgensen & Tonie Rasmussen & Morten Hansen & Kate Andreasson & Bengt Karlsson, 2021. "User Involvement in the Handover between Mental Health Hospitals and Community Mental Health: A Critical Discourse Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-13, March.
    6. Kim Jørgensen & Morten Hansen & Bengt Karlsson, 2022. "Recovery-Oriented Practices in a Mental Health Centre for Citizens Experiencing Serious Mental Issues and Substance Use: As Perceived by Healthcare Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-12, August.
    7. Kim Jørgensen & Kate Andreasson & Tonie Rasmussen & Morten Hansen & Bengt Karlsson, 2022. "Recovery-Oriented Cross-Sectoral Network Meetings between Mental Health Hospital Professionals and Community Mental Health Professionals: A Critical Discourse Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Calvin Swords & Stan Houston, 2023. "Exploring the Evidence for the Paradigms of Recovery and Social Work Converging in Mental Health Service Delivery Worldwide: Reflections from an Irish Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-14, July.
    9. Jacob M. Nielsen & Niels Buus & Lene L. Berring, 2023. "Mental Health Recovery in Social Psychiatric Policies: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-9, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:67:y:2021:i:6:p:788-800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.