IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v67y2021i6p632-642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlates of expressed emotions as perceived by patients with bipolar disorder

Author

Listed:
  • Ayush Sharma
  • Ritu Nehra
  • Sandeep Grover

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate expressed emotions (EEs) as perceived by the patients and its correlates among patients with bipolar disorder (BD). Methodology: One hundred patients diagnosed with BD were assessed on the Perceived Criticism Measure (PCM), Family emotional involvement and criticism scale (FEICS), Brief dyadic scale for expressed emotions (BDSEE) and Vulnerability for abuse screening scale (VASS) to assess EE and possible abuse by the caregivers. Caregivers were evaluated on family burden interview schedule and family coping questionnaire. Results: Longer duration of illness (Pearson’s correlation coefficient: −0.335; p  = .001***) and longer duration of treatment (Pearson’s correlation coefficient: −0.317; p  = .001***) were associated with significantly lower perceived criticism as assessed by FEICS. Higher use of coping mechanisms such as coercion, avoidance and resignation by caregivers were associated with the higher perception of EE, whereas the use of coping mechanisms such as information seeking, communication, and social involvement by the caregivers was associated with the perception of lower EE among the patients. Higher caregiver burden was associated with a higher perception of the EE by the patients. Higher perception of abuse by the patients was associated with higher EE. Conclusions: Present study suggests that higher use of maladaptive coping, caregiver burden, and abuse has a significant impact on the EE. Accordingly, psychosocial interventions need to focus on caregivers to reduce EE.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayush Sharma & Ritu Nehra & Sandeep Grover, 2021. "Correlates of expressed emotions as perceived by patients with bipolar disorder," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 67(6), pages 632-642, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:67:y:2021:i:6:p:632-642
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764020966633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764020966633
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764020966633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:67:y:2021:i:6:p:632-642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.