IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v66y2020i5p442-451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Depression, trauma and mentalizing: No influence of depressive symptoms on spontaneous theory of mind in a subclinical sample

Author

Listed:
  • Anna R Hudson
  • Corinne Orlemann
  • Tine Van Tricht
  • Marcel Brass
  • Sven C Mueller

Abstract

Background: Depressive symptoms are associated with impaired social functioning, arguably because of reduced mentalizing abilities. However, findings in persons with depressive symptoms and/or major depressive disorder (MDD) are presently mixed, finding evidence both for and against the hypothesis of reduced mentalizing abilities. Aims: This study investigated spontaneous cognitive mentalizing in 36 age-, sex- and education-matched students with depressive symptoms and 45 comparisons with minimal depressive symptoms. Method: To assess spontaneous mentalizing, we used the implicit theory of mind (ToM) task, which looks specifically at spontaneous computation of false belief. Results: Bayesian analysis did not support the hypothesis of impaired mentalizing; in fact, it suggested that the results were 3.90 times more likely to have occurred under the null hypothesis. Results remained stable when comparing depressed and non-depressed individuals without maltreatment exposure but were inconclusive in the maltreatment-exposed groups. Conclusion: The findings suggest no effect of spontaneous mentalizing in a high-functioning depressed sample. Moreover, the findings also emphasize the need to control for childhood maltreatment experiences in future ToM and social functioning research, as these may constitute subgroups within depressed samples. Tailored therapy for maltreated depression individuals may be beneficial.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna R Hudson & Corinne Orlemann & Tine Van Tricht & Marcel Brass & Sven C Mueller, 2020. "Depression, trauma and mentalizing: No influence of depressive symptoms on spontaneous theory of mind in a subclinical sample," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 66(5), pages 442-451, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:66:y:2020:i:5:p:442-451
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764020914918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764020914918
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764020914918?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:66:y:2020:i:5:p:442-451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.