IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v64y2018i4p396-405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Society and ‘good woman’: A critical review of gender difference in depression

Author

Listed:
  • Sucharita Maji

Abstract

Background: Worldwide, women are found to suffer from depression significantly more than men. This has puzzled the scientists since no biological explanation can completely resolve the matter. Method: Extant empirical work has been conducted to solve the mystery of the issue. However, most of the research has pivoted their attention to biology. Therefore, based on the previous literature from the disciplines of medicine, psychology and sociology, the author aimed at looking and reviewing the matter critically. Specifically, the present critical review aims at conceptualising the psychological, social and cultural factors in the context of gender difference in depression. Discussion: The work reveals that psychological variables such as women’s unique attachment patterns, relational self-construal, as well as a macro-level issue like power dynamics based on gender, and the skewed division of labour play an important role in gender difference in depression. The work also suggests that focusing solely on biological underpinnings may result in losing the entire scenario; therefore, social and cultural issues that place women in a socially disadvantaged position are equally important.

Suggested Citation

  • Sucharita Maji, 2018. "Society and ‘good woman’: A critical review of gender difference in depression," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 64(4), pages 396-405, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:64:y:2018:i:4:p:396-405
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764018765023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764018765023
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764018765023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:64:y:2018:i:4:p:396-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.