IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v64y2018i3p258-265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines in connection to minimising coercion and mechanical restraint in a general psychiatric ward

Author

Listed:
  • Mikkel Højlund
  • Lene Høgh
  • Anders Bo Bojesen
  • Povl Munk-Jørgensen
  • Elsebeth Stenager

Abstract

Background: Decrease in coercive measures can lead to increased exposure to antipsychotics and benzodiazepines. This is not desirable as these drugs are associated with harmful side effects and reduced life expectancy. Aim: To quantify and compare the use of antipsychotic and anxiolytic medications in connection with the implementation of a programme to reduce coercion and restraint. Methods: Observational study in a general psychiatric ward comparing psychopharmacological treatment after implementation of non-pharmacological interventions to reduce coercion and mechanical restraint with a historical reference cohort from the same ward. Results: Data from 101 admissions after implementation of interventions were compared with data from 85 admissions in a historical reference cohort. Mean defined daily doses of antipsychotics, benzodiazepines or the total amount of both showed no difference before and after implementation of the programme. Standardised regression coefficients (β) from a mixed effects linear regression model, adjusted for age, gender, length of admission, involuntary admission and history of substance abuse showed that neither total dose of antipsychotics (adjusted β: .05, 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.20 to 0.31), total dose of benzodiazepines (adjusted β: −.13, 95%CI: −.42 to 0.16) nor total amount of both drugs (adjusted β: .00, 95%CI: −.26 to 0.21) increased after implementation. Conclusion: Decrease in coercive measures from 2013 to 2016 has not lead to significant increases in the use of antipsychotic medication or benzodiazepines. The interventions are useful in establishing restraint-free wards, and careful monitoring of the psychopharmacological treatment is important for patient safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikkel Højlund & Lene Høgh & Anders Bo Bojesen & Povl Munk-Jørgensen & Elsebeth Stenager, 2018. "Use of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines in connection to minimising coercion and mechanical restraint in a general psychiatric ward," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 64(3), pages 258-265, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:64:y:2018:i:3:p:258-265
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764018760650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764018760650
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764018760650?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:64:y:2018:i:3:p:258-265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.