Author
Listed:
- Hendri-Charl Eksteen
- Piet J Becker
- Gian Lippi
Abstract
Background: Stigma towards the mentally ill is a well-known phenomenon and it is not restricted to certain communities or countries. Stigma, be it self-stigma or public stigma, has a major influence in mental health care. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine whether stigmatizing attitudes towards the mentally ill differ according to the level of knowledge about psychiatric illnesses and whether the level of exposure towards the mentally ill plays a role in stigmatizing attitudes. Method: This study was carried out by assessing psychiatrists ( n  = 68), pre-clinical ( n  = 194) and post-clinical ( n  = 354) medical students’ attitudes towards the mentally ill using the Mental Illness: Clinicians’ Attitudes (MICA) scale. The scale is scored on a Likert scale with higher scores indicating higher levels of stigmatization. Results: Participants in the three groups had statistical significant different levels of stigma with a decline in scores as you are more exposed to psychiatry. Familiarity with mental illness was associated with less stigma. Participants who had friends or family members who suffered from mental illness or they themselves suffered from a mental illness had less stigma. Conclusion: More exposure to mental health–related issues are needed not only in communities but also in medical schools. Medical students need to be targeted for educational intervention because they are the future doctors who might pursue psychiatry as their field of choice. Stigma against psychiatry as a medical profession should also be addressed. If psychiatry is to be respected as a medical profession, mental illness–related stigma interventions need to be put in place to raise awareness about the negative impact of stigma.
Suggested Citation
Hendri-Charl Eksteen & Piet J Becker & Gian Lippi, 2017.
"Stigmatization towards the mentally ill: Perceptions of psychiatrists, pre-clinical and post-clinical rotation medical students,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(8), pages 782-791, December.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:63:y:2017:i:8:p:782-791
DOI: 10.1177/0020764017735865
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:63:y:2017:i:8:p:782-791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.