IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v62y2016i7p601-607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Low prevalence of the use of the Chinese term for ‘psychiatry’ in the names of community psychiatry clinics: A nationwide study in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Ying-Xiu Dai
  • Mu-Hong Chen
  • Tzeng-Ji Chen

Abstract

Background: Relabeling has been proposed as a strategy to reduce the stigma associated with mental illnesses. Previous studies have shown that changing the names of psychiatry clinics has led to reduced feelings of being stigmatized among patients. In Taiwan, terms other than ‘psychiatry’ (in Chinese, jīng shén kē) are more commonly used in the names of psychiatry clinics. The term ‘psychosomatic clinics’ is widely used instead. Aims: This study investigated the characteristics of psychiatry clinic names in order to better understand the role of clinic names in primary care settings. Methods: Relevant data were extracted from an open database maintained by the government of Taiwan. These data included the names of community psychiatry clinics and hospital-based psychiatry clinics, population size and the degree of urbanization in the area served by each clinic. Results: At the time of this study, there were 254 community psychiatry clinics and 190 hospital-based psychiatry clinics in Taiwan. Only 18.9% of the community clinic names included the term ‘psychiatry’. Additionally, 14.6% of community clinic names and 28.4% of hospital-based clinic names included the term ‘psychosomatics’. The regions in which clinics without ‘psychiatry’ in their names were located had significantly larger populations and higher levels of urbanization than the regions in which clinics with ‘psychiatry’ in their names were located. Conclusion: A low prevalence of the term ‘psychiatry’ in community psychiatry clinic names was found in Taiwan. The stigma associated with psychiatry and other socio-cultural factors are hypothesized to explain this phenomenon.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying-Xiu Dai & Mu-Hong Chen & Tzeng-Ji Chen, 2016. "Low prevalence of the use of the Chinese term for ‘psychiatry’ in the names of community psychiatry clinics: A nationwide study in Taiwan," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 62(7), pages 601-607, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:62:y:2016:i:7:p:601-607
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764016660994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764016660994
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764016660994?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mojtabai, R., 2005. "Trends in contacts with mental health professionals and cost barriers to mental health care among adults with significant psychological distress in the United States: 1997-2002," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(11), pages 2009-2014.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junfang Xu & Jian Wang & Madeleine King & Ruiyun Liu & Fenghua Yu & Jinshui Xing & Lei Su & Mingshan Lu, 2018. "Rural–urban disparities in the utilization of mental health inpatient services in China: the role of health insurance," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 377-393, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:62:y:2016:i:7:p:601-607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.