Author
Listed:
- MarÃlia Silva de Souza
- Ricardo Azevedo da Silva
- Mariane Acosta Lopez Molina
- Karen Jansen
- Luana de Lima Ferreira
- Evelin Franco Kelbert
- Jennifer Mendes Soares
- Luciano Dias de Mattos Souza
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the impact of psychoeducational intervention on the levels of burden, of self-esteem and quality of life in caregivers of patients diagnosed with Bipolar Disorders. Method: In this randomized clinical trial, changes in degree of burden, levels of self-esteem and quality of life were evaluated. Caregivers could participate in the group of psychoeducation (six sessions) or usual treatment (without psychoeducation following a manual). Results: There were no significant differences regarding levels of objective burden between groups. Both groups presented improvement in subjective burden scores throughout the interventions. Objective burden scores showed significant reduction in the usual treatment group ( p  = .003) and a trend toward decrease in the psychoeducational intervention ( p  = .081). There are no differences regarding improvement in perceived self-esteem and quality of life when comparing means between the groups with and without intervention. Conclusion: A six-session caregiver psychoeducational intervention on bipolar disorder did not bring benefits to caregiver’s health. A longer longitudinal follow-up study would be crucial to see whether there were differences in degree of burden, perceived self-esteem and quality of life over time in caregivers.
Suggested Citation
MarÃlia Silva de Souza & Ricardo Azevedo da Silva & Mariane Acosta Lopez Molina & Karen Jansen & Luana de Lima Ferreira & Evelin Franco Kelbert & Jennifer Mendes Soares & Luciano Dias de Mattos Souza, 2016.
"Six-session caregiver psychoeducation on bipolar disorder: Does it bring benefits to caregivers?,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 62(4), pages 377-385, June.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:62:y:2016:i:4:p:377-385
DOI: 10.1177/0020764016636909
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:62:y:2016:i:4:p:377-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.