Author
Listed:
- Sandeep Grover
- Ajit Avasthi
- Sunil Gupta
- Amitava Dan
- Rajarshi Neogi
- Prakash B Behere
- Bhavesh Lakdawala
- Adarsh Tripathi
- Kaustav Chakraborty
- Vishal Sinha
- Manjeet Singh Bhatia
- Amrit Patjoshi
- TSS Rao
- Abhijit Rozatkar
Abstract
Aim: To assess the phenomenology and associated beliefs in patients with Dhat syndrome. Methods: A total of 780 male patients aged more than 16 years were recruited from 15 centers spread across the country and were assessed on Dhat Syndrome Questionnaire. Results: The most commonly reported reasons for passage of Dhat were excessive masturbation (55.1%), sexual dreams (47.3%), excessive sexual desire (42.8%) and consumption of high energy foods (36.7%). The most common situation in which participants experienced passage of Dhat were as ‘night falls’ (60.1%) and ‘while passing stools’ (59.5%). The most common consequence due to passage of Dhat was weakness in sexual ability (75.6%). In terms of psychological and somatic symptoms, the common symptoms included bodily weakness (78.2%); feeling tired or having low energy (75.9%); feeling down, depressed, or hopeless (67.9%); and little interest or pleasure in doing things (63.7%). In terms of treatment expectations, about half of the patients (49.1%) expected that energizing medications like vitamins/tonics/tablets were required and more than one-third (38.2%) expected that there was a need for taking energizing injections. Conclusion: Present study shows that Dhat syndrome is a distinct clinical entity seen all over India, with its characteristic features.
Suggested Citation
Sandeep Grover & Ajit Avasthi & Sunil Gupta & Amitava Dan & Rajarshi Neogi & Prakash B Behere & Bhavesh Lakdawala & Adarsh Tripathi & Kaustav Chakraborty & Vishal Sinha & Manjeet Singh Bhatia & Amrit , 2016.
"Phenomenology and beliefs of patients with Dhat syndrome: A nationwide multicentric study,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 62(1), pages 57-66, February.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:62:y:2016:i:1:p:57-66
DOI: 10.1177/0020764015591857
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:62:y:2016:i:1:p:57-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.