IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v61y2015i7p700-710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Type of unit and population served matters when implementing a smoke-free policy in mental health settings: Perceptions of unit managers across England

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Zabeen
  • George Tsourtos
  • Jonathan Campion
  • Sharon Lawn

Abstract

Background: Globally, smoking remains a significant issue for mental health populations. Many mental health trusts in England are facing challenges of implementing the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance according to which all mental health settings, no matter the type, should be entirely smoke-free and provide comprehensive smoking cessation support. Aim: The aim of this paper was to determine if unit type and unit manager smoking status influence mental health smoke-free policy implementation. Method: This paper reports on the secondary analysis of data from a cross-sectional survey of 147 mental health inpatient settings in England, in 2010. The original study’s main aim was to understand unit managers’ perceived reasons for success or failure of smoke-free policy. Results: Unit managers ( n  = 131) held a positive stance towards supporting smoke-free policy and most perceived that the policy was successful. Non-smoker unit managers were more likely to adopt complete bans than smoker unit managers, whereas smoker unit managers were more likely than non-smoker unit managers to think that stopping smoking aggravated patients’ mental illness. Smoking rates for staff and patients remain high, as perceived by unit managers, regardless of unit type. Proportion of units offering nicotine replacement therapy and peer support to patients was significantly higher in locked units compared to semi-locked or residential rehabilitation. Applied strategies significantly vary by type of unit, whereas unit managers’ knowledge, attitude and practices vary by their smoking status. Discussion: There are nuanced differences in how smoke-free policy is enacted which vary by unit type. These variations recognise the differing contexts of care provision in different types of units serving different patient groups. Addressing staff smoking rates, promoting consistency of staff response to patients’ smoking and providing staff education and support continue to be key strategies to successful smoke-free policy. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the importance of taking into account the type of unit and acuity of patients when enacting smoke-free policy and addressing staff smoking.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Zabeen & George Tsourtos & Jonathan Campion & Sharon Lawn, 2015. "Type of unit and population served matters when implementing a smoke-free policy in mental health settings: Perceptions of unit managers across England," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 61(7), pages 700-710, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:61:y:2015:i:7:p:700-710
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764015575799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015575799
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764015575799?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharon J. Lawn, 2004. "Systemic Barriers to Quitting Smoking among Institutionalised Public Mental Health Service Populations: A Comparison of Two Australian Sites," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 50(3), pages 204-215, September.
    2. WHO World Health Organization, 2013. "Who Report On The Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2013," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt5t06910t, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruoyan Sun & David Mendez, 2019. "Finding the optimal mix of smoking initiation and cessation interventions to reduce smoking prevalence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Lin, Wanchuan & Sloan, Frank, 2015. "Risk perceptions and smoking decisions of adult Chinese men," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 60-73.
    3. Harsman Tandilittin, 2016. "What should the Government do to Stop Epidemic of Smoking among Teenagers in Indonesia?," Asian Culture and History, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(1), pages 140-140, March.
    4. Nihaya Al-Sheyab & Mahmoud A. Alomari & Smita Shah & Patrick Gallagher & Robyn Gallagher, 2014. "Prevalence, Patterns and Correlates of Cigarette Smoking in Male Adolescents in Northern Jordan, and the Influence of Waterpipe Use and Asthma Diagnosis: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Daniel Kuehnle & Christoph Wunder, 2017. "The Effects of Smoking Bans on Self‐Assessed Health: Evidence from Germany," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 321-337, March.
    6. Ko, Hansoo, 2021. "Behavioral responses to the 2015 MERS epidemic in Korea," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    7. Frida Ngalesoni & George Ruhago & Mary Mayige & Tiago Cravo Oliveira & Bjarne Robberstad & Ole Frithjof Norheim & Hideki Higashi, 2017. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of population-based tobacco control strategies in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases in Tanzania," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Noar, Seth M. & Francis, Diane B. & Bridges, Christy & Sontag, Jennah M. & Ribisl, Kurt M. & Brewer, Noel T., 2016. "The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 118-129.
    9. Harpreet Sohal & Lisa Huddlestone & Elena Ratschen, 2016. "Preparing for Completely Smoke-Free Mental Health Settings: Findings on Patient Smoking, Resources Spent Facilitating Smoking Breaks, and the Role of Smoking in Reported Incidents from a Large Mental ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-12, February.
    10. Jan Schnellenbach, 2016. "A Constitutional Economics Perspective on Soft Paternalism," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(1), pages 135-156, February.
    11. Madhur Verma & Soundappan Kathirvel & Milan Das & Ramnika Aggarwal & Sonu Goel, 2020. "Trends and patterns of second-hand smoke exposure amongst the non-smokers in India-A secondary data analysis from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) I & II," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Carlo Ciccarelli & Pierpaolo Pierani & Silvia Tiezzi, 2014. "Secular trends in tobacco consumption: the case of Italy, 1871-2010," Department of Economics University of Siena 700, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    13. Elena Ratschen & John Britton & Gillian Doody & Ann Mcneill, 2010. "Smoking Attitudes, Behaviour and Nicotine Dependence Among Mental Health Acute Inpatients: an Exploratory Study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 56(2), pages 107-118, March.
    14. Chia-Chen Lu & Yu-Chuan Hsiao & Hui-Wen Huang & Jhen-Yi Lin & Chih-Ling Huang, 2019. "Effects of a Nurse-Led, Stage-Matched, Tailored Program for Smoking Cessation in Health Education Centers: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 28(7), pages 812-829, September.
    15. Anh Ngo & Geoffrey T. Fong & Lorraine V. Craig & Ce Shang, 2019. "Analysis of Gender Differences in the Impact of Taxation and Taxation Structure on Cigarette Consumption in 17 ITC Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-11, April.
    16. Marissa G. Hall & Kathryn Peebles & Laura E. Bach & Seth M. Noar & Kurt M. Ribisl & Noel T. Brewer, 2015. "Social Interactions Sparked by Pictorial Warnings on Cigarette Packs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Marieke Hiemstra & Rutger C M E Engels & Edward D Barker & Onno C P van Schayck & Roy Otten, 2013. "Smoking-Specific Parenting and Smoking Onset in Adolescence: The Role of Genes from the Dopaminergic System (DRD2, DRD4, DAT1 Genotypes)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-10, April.
    18. World Bank, 2014. "Albania Public Finance Review : Part 2. Improving the Efficiency and Quality of Public Spending," World Bank Publications - Reports 20442, The World Bank Group.
    19. Krzysztof Chmielowiec & Jolanta Chmielowiec & Aleksandra Strońska-Pluta & Grzegorz Trybek & Małgorzata Śmiarowska & Aleksandra Suchanecka & Grzegorz Woźniak & Aleksandra Jaroń & Anna Grzywacz, 2022. "Association of Polymorphism CHRNA5 and CHRNA3 Gene in People Addicted to Nicotine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, August.
    20. Mastura Johar & Manimaran Krishnan Kaundan & Samsudin A. Rahim & Nur Faezah Hamzah & Hana Marlin Mahfodz & Baharudin Omar & Chang Peng Kee, 2018. "Public Inputs and Behaviour on Smoke-Free Initiatives in Malaysia," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(7), pages 346-353, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:61:y:2015:i:7:p:700-710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.