IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v61y2015i7p668-676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sometimes more competent, but always less warm: Perceptions of biologically oriented mental-health clinicians

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew S Lebowitz
  • Woo-kyoung Ahn
  • Kathleen Oltman

Abstract

Background and aims: Biological conceptualizations of psychopathology are ascendant, including among mental-health clinicians. However, it is unknown how this might affect people’s perceptions of clinicians, which in turn could have considerable public-health implications. The present studies sought to address this issue. Methods: In the present research, participants imagined that they or their loved ones were suffering from a mental disorder and then rated their perceptions of one clinician espousing the view that ‘mental disorders are brain diseases’ and another describing them as ‘disorders of thoughts and emotions’. Results: Biologically oriented clinicians were perceived as more competent and effective only when the disorder in question was judged to be biologically caused. Otherwise, there was no significant difference in perceived competence, and biologically oriented clinicians were rated less effective. Regardless, all participants perceived the biologically oriented clinician as significantly less warm on average than the psychosocially oriented clinician. Conclusion: These findings may have important clinical implications for the crucial therapeutic alliance between therapists and patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew S Lebowitz & Woo-kyoung Ahn & Kathleen Oltman, 2015. "Sometimes more competent, but always less warm: Perceptions of biologically oriented mental-health clinicians," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 61(7), pages 668-676, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:61:y:2015:i:7:p:668-676
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764015573086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015573086
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764015573086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:61:y:2015:i:7:p:668-676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.