IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v60y2014i8p759-765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of leverage in community mental health: Ethical guidance for practitioners

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Dunn
  • Julia MA Sinclair
  • Krysia J Canvin
  • Jorun RugkÃ¥sa
  • Tom Burns

Abstract

Background: Leverage is a particular type of treatment pressure that is used within community mental health services to increase patients’ adherence to treatment. Because leverage involves practitioners making proposals that attempt to influence patients’ behaviours and choices, the use of leverage raises ethical issues. Aim: To provide guidance that can assist practitioners in making judgements about whether it is ethically acceptable to use leverage in a particular clinical context. Method: Methods of ethical analysis. Results: Four ethical duties relevant to making such judgements are outlined. These four duties are (1) benefitting the individual patient, (2) benefitting other individuals, (3) treating patients fairly and (4) respecting patients’ autonomy. The practical requirements that follow from each of these duties are considered in detail. It is argued that practitioners should determine whether the use of leverage will mean that care is provided in ways that are consistent with the requirements of these four duties, regardless of whether the patient accepts or rejects the terms of the proposal made. Conclusion: Particular attention must be paid to determine how the requirements of the four duties should be applied in each specific treatment scenario, and in making careful judgements when these duties pull in opposing directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Dunn & Julia MA Sinclair & Krysia J Canvin & Jorun RugkÃ¥sa & Tom Burns, 2014. "The use of leverage in community mental health: Ethical guidance for practitioners," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(8), pages 759-765, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:60:y:2014:i:8:p:759-765
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764013519083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764013519083
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764013519083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:60:y:2014:i:8:p:759-765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.