IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v60y2014i7p687-694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do newspaper reports of suicides comply with standard suicide reporting guidelines? A study from Bangalore, India

Author

Listed:
  • Prabha S Chandra
  • Padmavathy Doraiswamy
  • Anuroopa Padmanabh
  • Mariamma Philip

Abstract

Background: Several countries have prescribed standard guidelines for media professionals on suicide reporting. However, the implementation of these guidelines has been varied. Suicide rates in South Asia are one of the highest in the world, and it is known that media guidelines for suicide reporting are not followed adequately. However, there are no published reports available from this region. Aim: This study aimed at assessing newspaper reports of suicide for quality of reporting based on standard reporting guidelines and to study differences between English and vernacular ( Kannada ) newspapers in Bangalore, South India. Methods: A total of 341 newspaper reports of suicide from 550 newspapers (3 English and 3 Kannada ) over 3 months were systematically assessed for compliance with reporting guidelines. Each report was evaluated on 2 domains and 36 parameters. Data were analyzed for frequency of inappropriate reporting and patterns compared between vernacular and English newspapers. Results: In all, 87% of the reports were those of completed suicide. Non-compliant reporting – method of suicide was reported in 89% and 32% of reports were in prominent pages of the newspaper, 95% mentioned gender, 90% reported the name, 80% reported age and suicide location, 75% reported life events related to suicide, 70% reported occupation, 69% had headline explicity on suicide and 61% reported monocausality. Only 16% reported mental disorder related to suicide, and less than 3% included information on suicide prevention and helplines. Vernacular papers showed significantly better compliance in 16 of the 20 areas. However, protective characteristics were better reported in English newspapers. Conclusion: Majority of reports on suicides in newspapers from Bangalore did not comply with standard guidelines of reporting. There is a strong need to evolve local guidelines and mechanisms for ensuring responsible reporting which have important implications in prevention of suicide.

Suggested Citation

  • Prabha S Chandra & Padmavathy Doraiswamy & Anuroopa Padmanabh & Mariamma Philip, 2014. "Do newspaper reports of suicides comply with standard suicide reporting guidelines? A study from Bangalore, India," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(7), pages 687-694, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:60:y:2014:i:7:p:687-694
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764013513438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764013513438
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764013513438?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Collings, Sunny C. & Kemp, Christopher G., 2010. "Death knocks, professional practice, and the public good: The media experience of suicide reporting in New Zealand," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 244-248, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vikas Menon & Charanya Kaliamoorthy & Vivekanandhan Kavanoor Sridhar & Natarajan Varadharajan & Rini Joseph & Shivanand Kattimani & Sujita Kumar Kar & SM Yasir Arafat, 2020. "Do Tamil newspapers educate the public about suicide? Content analysis from a high suicide Union Territory in India," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 66(8), pages 785-791, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:60:y:2014:i:7:p:687-694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.