Author
Listed:
- Shanthi Johnson
- Manoranjitham Sathyaseelan
- Helen Charles
- Visalakshi Jeyaseelan
- Kuruthukulangara S Jacob
Abstract
Background and aims: There is a dearth of data on the predictors of insight in schizophrenia. This study attempted to assess the predictors of insight in a cohort of first-episode schizophrenia followed up over 5 years. Methods: Patients diagnosed to have Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV ) schizophrenia ( n = 131) were assessed prospectively for insight, psychopathology and explanatory models of illness over a 5-year period using standard instruments. Multiple linear regression and generalized estimating equations (GEE) were employed to assess predictors of insight. Results: We could follow up 95 (72.5%) patients, 5 years after recruitment. A total of 65 of these patients interviewed at 60 months (68.4%) achieved remission. Cross-sectional evaluations suggest a relationship between insight, psychosis rating and explanatory models of illness with good insight and medical models associated with good outcome. However, baseline and early illness data do not predict insight scores at 5 years. Serial longitudinal assessment of insight is negatively associated with Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scores and positively associated with the number of nonmedical explanatory models of illness held by patients. Conclusion: These findings argue that insight and explanatory models of illness are secondary to psychopathology, course and outcome. They are dependent on the trajectory of the person’s illness, are not independent of the condition and call for multifaceted understanding of the issues.
Suggested Citation
Shanthi Johnson & Manoranjitham Sathyaseelan & Helen Charles & Visalakshi Jeyaseelan & Kuruthukulangara S Jacob, 2014.
"Predictors of insight in first-episode schizophrenia: A 5-year cohort study from India,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(6), pages 566-574, September.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:60:y:2014:i:6:p:566-574
DOI: 10.1177/0020764013504561
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:60:y:2014:i:6:p:566-574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.