IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v60y2014i3p227-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of a question prompt sheet on active patient behaviour: A randomized controlled trial with depressed outpatients

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Hamann
  • Nikolaos Maris
  • Paraskevi Iosifidou
  • Rosmarie Mendel
  • Rudolf Cohen
  • Petra Wolf
  • Werner Kissling

Abstract

Background: A deeper engagement into medical decision-making is demanded by treatment guidelines for patients with affective disorders. There is to date little evidence on what facilitates active behaviour of patients with depression. In general medicine ‘question prompt sheets’ (QPSs) have been shown to change patients’ behaviour in the consultation and improve treatment satisfaction but there is no evidence for such interventions for mental health settings. Aims: To study the effects of a QPS on active patient behaviour in the consultation. Methods: Randomized controlled trial (involving N = 100 outpatients with depression) evaluating the effects of a QPS on patients’ behaviour in the consultation. Results: The QPS showed no influence on the number of topics raised by patients ( p = .13) nor on the external rater’s perception of ‘Who made the decisions in today’s consultation?’ ( p = .50). Conclusions: A QPS did not change depressed patients’ behaviour in the consultation. More complex interventions might be needed to change depressed patients’ behaviour within an established doctor–patient dyad. Patient seminars addressing behavioural aspects have been shown to be effective in other settings and may also be feasible for outpatients with affective disorders.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Hamann & Nikolaos Maris & Paraskevi Iosifidou & Rosmarie Mendel & Rudolf Cohen & Petra Wolf & Werner Kissling, 2014. "Effects of a question prompt sheet on active patient behaviour: A randomized controlled trial with depressed outpatients," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(3), pages 227-235, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:60:y:2014:i:3:p:227-235
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764013482311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764013482311
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764013482311?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:60:y:2014:i:3:p:227-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.