IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v59y2013i1p87-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A social/emotional theory of ‘mental illness’

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Scheff

Abstract

One reason that theories of mental illness have made little progress may be their focus on individuals, omitting the social/relational and emotional world . Adding these components will be difficult, however: in modern societies they have become virtually invisible, particularly the emotion of shame. The theory outlined here is based on the work of Cooley, Elias, Lewis and Goffman: shame is both social and individual and, if anticipation is included, virtually omnipresent in modern societies. It is proposed that most symptoms of mental illness are products of shame and relational feedback loops : emotion and alienation can both spiral leading to further alienation and chaotic or hidden emotions. Almost everyone is especially ashamed of their shame. Being ashamed of one’s shame and/or anger can spiral when not acknowledged . Under certain conditions, these spirals continue without limit, generating immense force for acting out symptoms or depression. To the extent that this theory is true, we would need to rename the field using non-medical terms, such as emotional/social dysfunction.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Scheff, 2013. "A social/emotional theory of ‘mental illness’," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(1), pages 87-92, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:59:y:2013:i:1:p:87-92
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764012445004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764012445004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764012445004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:59:y:2013:i:1:p:87-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.