IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v58y2012i4p381-385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social acknowledgement as a predictor of post-traumatic stress and complicated grief after witnessing assisted suicide

Author

Listed:
  • Birgit Wagner
  • Valerie Keller
  • Christine Knaevelsrud
  • Andreas Maercker

Abstract

Background: In Switzerland, right-to-die organizations such as Exit Deutsche Schweiz offer suicide assistance to their members. However, there is limited knowledge of the impact that witnessing assisted suicide has on the post-traumatic stress severity or the grief process of family members. Low perceived social acknowledgement may affect mental health. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 85 family members who were present at an assisted suicide was conducted in December 2007. The Inventory of Complicated Grief and the Impact of Event Scale were used to assess symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complicated grief (CG) at 14 to 24 months post-loss. Further, the Social Acknowledgement Questionnaire was used to examine the impact that the social environment’s acknowledgement of the end-of-life decision had on respondents’ mental health. Results: As expected, social acknowledgement as a survivor was related to PTSD symptoms and CG. In particular, perceived general disapproval was strongly correlated with all outcome measures, whereas recognition was not significantly related to PTSD or CG (intrusion and avoidance). Conclusion: Family members of patients who use assisted suicide may hesitate to disclose the manner of death, and the community and societal environment may express strong views concerning the end-of-life decision. This can lead to increased levels of PTSD and CG.

Suggested Citation

  • Birgit Wagner & Valerie Keller & Christine Knaevelsrud & Andreas Maercker, 2012. "Social acknowledgement as a predictor of post-traumatic stress and complicated grief after witnessing assisted suicide," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 58(4), pages 381-385, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:58:y:2012:i:4:p:381-385
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764011400791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764011400791
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764011400791?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:58:y:2012:i:4:p:381-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.