IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v58y2012i1p79-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study of psychological symptoms, family function, marital and life satisfactions of polygamous and monogamous women: The Palestinian case

Author

Listed:
  • Alean Al-Krenawi

Abstract

Background : Polygamy is defined as a marriage in which a spouse of either gender has more than one mate at the same time. Polygamy is considered a valid form of marriage in many countries and communities around the globe. Aim : The purpose of this study is to examine the psychological symptoms, family function, marital satisfaction, life satisfaction and the degree of agreement with the practice of polygamy among ‘senior wives’ – the first wife in the polygamous marriage – and women in monogamous marriages in the West Bank, Palestine. Method : A convenience sample of 309 women, 187 from polygamous and 122 from monogamous families, participated in this study. All women from polygamous families were senior wives. The following instruments were deployed: the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD), the ENRICH marital satisfaction questionnaire, the SCL-90 mental health symptoms checklist, the Rosenberg self-esteem (SE) scale, the Diener et al. (1985), a life satisfaction scale, and a basic socio-demographic scale, including the degree of agreement of the practice of polygamy. Results : The findings revealed significant differences between senior wives in polygamous marriages and wives in monogamous marriages with regard to family functioning, marital satisfaction, self-esteem and life satisfaction. Likewise, many of the mental health symptoms were different. Particularly noteworthy were somatization, depression, hostility psychotism and the General Severity Index (a global index of distress). More women in polygamous marriages agreed with the practice of polygamy than their monogamous counterparts. Conclusion : Practitioners and policy makers need to be aware of the consequences of polygamy on first wives and on society as whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Alean Al-Krenawi, 2012. "A study of psychological symptoms, family function, marital and life satisfactions of polygamous and monogamous women: The Palestinian case," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 58(1), pages 79-86, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:58:y:2012:i:1:p:79-86
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764010387063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764010387063
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764010387063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mustafa Ozkan & Abdurrahman Altindag & Remzi Oto & Esin Sentunali, 2006. "Mental Health Aspects of Turkish Women from Polygamous Versus Monogamous Families," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 52(3), pages 214-220, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nuzha Allassad Alhuzail & Avi Besser & Virgil Zeigler-Hill, 2024. "Sharing Your Husband: Adult Attachment Styles and Emotional Responses of Israeli Bedouin-Arab Women to Potential Polygynous Marriage," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(10), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ertan Yılmaz & Lut Tamam, 2018. "The relationship between polygamy and psychiatric disorders in Turkish women," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 64(8), pages 821-827, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:58:y:2012:i:1:p:79-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.