Author
Listed:
- Helen Lloyd
(Department of Social Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK, helen.lloyd@psych.ox.ac.uk)
- Pratima Singh
(University of Oxford, UK)
- Rowena Merritt
(Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK)
- Adarsh Shetty
(University of Oxford, UK)
- Jenny Yiend
(Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK)
- Swaran Singh
(East Birmingham Early Intervention Service, Warwick University, UK)
- Tom Burns
(Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK)
Abstract
Background: Caregiver burden in mental illness is believed to differ between ethnic groups, but few studies have examined this in schizophrenia in the UK. Aim: To measure burden in British North Indian Sikh and white British parents with a son or daughter with established schizophrenia managed in outpatient care. Method: A cross-cultural cohort study measuring family factors, patient psychopathology and levels of burden and distress. Results: Overall levels of burden were low with no significant differences between the groups. Burden subscale scores showed Indian parents were more affected by psychotic behaviours than white parents. The groups also differed on several sociodemographic variables. Conclusion: In stabilized community patients, the overall extent of burden experienced by both Indian and white parents is low and comparable. However, Indian parents were more burdened by psychotic behaviours. This may be a result of co-residence as Indian patients are more likely to live with their families. Social and economic factors in the country of residence and levels of acculturation may also influence levels of burden and the illness behaviours found most bothersome by parents.
Suggested Citation
Helen Lloyd & Pratima Singh & Rowena Merritt & Adarsh Shetty & Jenny Yiend & Swaran Singh & Tom Burns, 2011.
"A Comparison of Levels of Burden in Indian and White Parents With a Son or Daughter With Schizophrenia,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 57(3), pages 300-311, May.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:57:y:2011:i:3:p:300-311
DOI: 10.1177/0020764009354838
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:57:y:2011:i:3:p:300-311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.