IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v56y2010i4p359-370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Stops Us From Healing the Healers: a Survey of Help-Seeking Behaviour, Stigmatisation and Depression Within the Medical Profession

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth F.M. Adams

    (Plymouth Teaching Primary Care Trust, AOS, Riverview, Mount Gould Hospital, Plymouth PL4 7QD)

  • Alison J. Lee

    (Devon Partnership Trust, Child and Family Guidance, Torbay Hospital Annexe, Torquay, TQ2 7BA)

  • Colin W. Pritchard

    (Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust, Peninsula Research and Development Support Unit (Truro), Knowledge Spa, Truro, TR1 3HD)

  • Rupert J.E. White

    (Cornwall Partnership Trust, Cornwall Drugs and Alcohol Team, Tolvean House, Redruth, TR15 2SF, lizffc@btinternet.com)

Abstract

Background: Doctors are poor at help-seeking, particularly for mental ill health; attitudes of colleagues reflecting stigmatisation may be important factors influencing decisions to seek support. Aims: This article focuses on doctors’ attitudes to depression rather than mental illness in general. It seeks to determine the extent to which doctors perceive depression is stigmatised within the medical profession and whether the level of perceived stigma affects patterns of help-seeking behaviour. Method : A postal survey was sent to 1488 General Practitioners and 152 psychiatrists in Devon and Cornwall. Questions assessed stigmatising attitudes to depression; help-seeking behaviour and barriers to help-seeking. Prevalence of self-reported depression and time off work was measured. Results: The response rate was 76.6%. Doctors perceived that many of their profession hold stigmatising views of depression. Some 46.2% of respondents reported that they had suffered an episode of depression. Help-seeking was significantly reduced in those with a history of depression. Barriers to help-seeking were reported as letting colleagues down (73.1%), confidentiality (53.4%), letting patients down (51.9%) and career progression (15.7%). Gender and a history of depression significantly affected help-seeking behaviour and perceived stigmatisation. Higher levels of perceived stigma increased concerns about help-seeking and reduced help-seeking from own GP or colleagues. Conclusion: Stigma associated with depression in doctors is endemic in the medical profession and the level of perceived stigma is related to reduced help-seeking behaviour. Efforts need to be made by the profession to reduce the stigma anticipated by those who become depressed, to enable appropriate help-seeking and support.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth F.M. Adams & Alison J. Lee & Colin W. Pritchard & Rupert J.E. White, 2010. "What Stops Us From Healing the Healers: a Survey of Help-Seeking Behaviour, Stigmatisation and Depression Within the Medical Profession," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 56(4), pages 359-370, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:56:y:2010:i:4:p:359-370
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764008099123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764008099123
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764008099123?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosvold, Elin Olaug & Vaglum, Per & Moum, Torbjørn, 0. "Use of minor tranquilizers among Norwegian physicians. A nation-wide comparative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(4-5), pages 581-590, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:56:y:2010:i:4:p:359-370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.