Author
Listed:
- Barbara Laird
(Henry Rongomau Bennett Centre, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand)
- Barry Smith
(Social Research Consultant, Rotorua, New Zealand)
- Gaelle Dutu
(Waikato Clinical School, Peter Rothwell Building, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand)
- Graham Mellsop
(Waikato Clinical School, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand, mellsopg@waikatodhb.govt.nz)
Abstract
Background: Family ( whanau ) and other carers can play a central part in the natural history of psychiatric service users. Diagnoses or the classification of mental disorders play a significant role in communications between clinicians, psychiatric service users, and family. Despite that centrality, the views and experiences of family on the utility of the present classification systems have been little studied. Aims: This study aimed to document the understanding and opinions of families/ whanau on the utility of diagnostic labels as they observed them being applied to their family members. Method: This is a qualitative study. The families of two cultural groups (New Zealand Maori and non-Maori) of psychiatric service users were interviewed using a structured approach. Results: A number of themes on the utility of the diagnostic systems emerged. The single most powerful message being that how the diagnostic labels were communicated, and how they were utilized in the patient management planning, were of paramount importance. There were some cross-cultural differences. From Maori, there was a particular plea for a greater incorporation of culturally syntonic concepts. Conclusion: Family/ whanau had positive views of the contributions current diagnostic practices make to patient care. The study elicited the view that more contextual issues, and not just phenomenology, should be taken into account in the development of diagnostic systems.
Suggested Citation
Barbara Laird & Barry Smith & Gaelle Dutu & Graham Mellsop, 2010.
"Views and Experiences of Family/whanau Carers of Psychiatric Service Users on Diagnosis and Classification,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 56(3), pages 270-279, May.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:56:y:2010:i:3:p:270-279
DOI: 10.1177/0020764008101637
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:56:y:2010:i:3:p:270-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.