IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v55y2009i5p401-406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does ‘No Pesticide’ Reduce Suicides?

Author

Listed:
  • Lakshmi Vijayakumar

    (SNEHA and Voluntary Health Services, Adyar, Chennai, India, dr_svk@vsnl.com)

  • R. Satheesh-Babu

    (Mamata Medical College, Khammam, India)

Abstract

Introduction: Ingestion of pesticides is the most common method of suicide, particularly in China, Sri Lanka and India. Reported pesticide suicides in India numbered 22,000 in the year 2006.z Method: Four villages in the state of Andhra Pradesh in India that had stopped using chemical pesticides in favour of non-pesticide management (NPM) were visited to assess any change in suicide incidence before and after discontinuation of chemical pesticides. Four similar villages in the same region that continued to use chemical pesticides were used as controls for comparison. Results: In the pesticide-free villages there were 14 suicides before introduction of NPM and only three suicides thereafter. The percentage of suicides not reported to authorities was 47%. Conclusion: Restriction of pesticide availability and accessibility by NPM has the potential to reduce pesticide suicides, in addition to psychosocial and health interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lakshmi Vijayakumar & R. Satheesh-Babu, 2009. "Does ‘No Pesticide’ Reduce Suicides?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 55(5), pages 401-406, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:55:y:2009:i:5:p:401-406
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764008095340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764008095340
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764008095340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:55:y:2009:i:5:p:401-406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.