IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v55y2009i4p348-360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors, Process and Outcomes of Recovery From Psychiatric Disability: the Unity Model

Author

Listed:
  • Li-Yu Song

    (Graduate Institute of Social Administration and Social Work, National Cheng Chi University, Taiwan, ROC, liyusong@ncnu.edu.tw)

  • Chaiw-Yi Shih

    (Department of Social Policy and Social Work, National Chi Nan University, Taiwan, ROC)

Abstract

Background: Despite the fruitful findings on related issues of recovery in the West, some researchers have called for more studies on the factors that facilitate recovery and international literature on recovery to be made available. Moreover, to date, a united model that integrates outcome, component process and contextual factors of recovery has not yet been developed. Thus, this study explored the recovery experiences of persons with psychiatric disabilities (hereinafter called consumers) in Taiwan and extracted the key facilitators for developing a preliminary unity theory of recovery. Material: In-depth qualitative interviews of 15 consumers in recovery and their caregivers were held. Over a research period of two years, consumers were interviewed twice. The dialogue of each interview was transcribed into text and a narrative summary of the storyline for each participant was also prepared. Discussion: For most consumers, the journey of recovery was an incremental process of progress, yet few of them mentioned a turning point and its significant change on their life. Regaining social roles seemed to be a necessary but not sufficient outcome indicator for recovery. While symptom remission, mental strength and parental support were the cornerstones for recovery, the treatment model and professionals got the credit for it too. Conclusion: The recovery process occurs within a complex context of various stages and multi-facilitators. The forces of three cornerstones, essential components and contextual facilitators all influx into the river of recovery and emerge as one united mechanism that supports the consumer's spiral progress through the journey of striving for autonomy.

Suggested Citation

  • Li-Yu Song & Chaiw-Yi Shih, 2009. "Factors, Process and Outcomes of Recovery From Psychiatric Disability: the Unity Model," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 55(4), pages 348-360, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:55:y:2009:i:4:p:348-360
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764008093805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764008093805
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764008093805?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yulia Kartalova-O’Doherty & Donna Tedstone Doherty, 2011. "Recovering from mental health problems: Perceived positive and negative effects of medication on reconnecting with life," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 57(6), pages 610-618, November.
    2. Samson Tse & Larry Davidson & Ka-fai Chung & Chong Ho Yu & King Lam Ng & Emily Tsoi, 2015. "Logistic regression analysis of psychosocial correlates associated with recovery from schizophrenia in a Chinese community," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 61(1), pages 50-57, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:55:y:2009:i:4:p:348-360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.