Author
Listed:
- Mahdi Najafi
(Tehran Heart Centre, Medical Sciences/University of Tehran, Iran)
- Mehrdad Sheikhvatan
(Tehran Heart Centre, Medical Sciences/University of Tehran, Iran, sheykhvatan@farabi.tums.ac.ir)
- Ali Montazeri
(Iranian Institute for Health Science Research, Tehran, Iran)
- Mahmood Sheikhfathollahi
(Tehran Heart Centre, Medical Sciences/University of Tehran, Iran)
Abstract
Objective: Several factors can influence the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The goal of this research was to measure quality of life in opium-addicted patients with CAD in order to assess the effect of CAD risk factors on their quality of life. Method: The WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire was completed through interviews with 275 patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass surgery in Tehran Heart Centre between May and September 2006. Results: No significant differences were found in the mean scores of the four domains of quality of life between the addicted and non-addicted patients. Furthermore, the evaluation of QOL in the groups with CAD risk factors showed that the mean QOL domains were statistically similar between opium addicted and non-opium addicted patients. In the addicted group, men had a higher psychological health score than women. A previous history of myocardial infarction reduced the psychological score in this group. Also, in the addicted patients with a history of diabetes mellitus, social functioning was better than that of the non-diabetics. Conclusions: The different domains of quality of life in our opium-addicted and non-addicted patients with CAD were similar; and among all the major risk factors for coronary artery disease, only female gender and a previous history of myocardial infarction could influence quality of life in the opium-addicted patients.
Suggested Citation
Mahdi Najafi & Mehrdad Sheikhvatan & Ali Montazeri & Mahmood Sheikhfathollahi, 2009.
"Quality of Life in Opium-Addicted Patients With Coronary Artery Disease as Measured With WHOQOL-BREF,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 55(3), pages 247-256, May.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:55:y:2009:i:3:p:247-256
DOI: 10.1177/0020764008093600
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:55:y:2009:i:3:p:247-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.