Author
Listed:
- Isa Okajima
(Japan Somnology Center, Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan, okajima@somnology.com)
- Yoshihiro Kanai
(School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan)
- Junwen Chen
(Department of Psychology, Tokai Gakuin University, Kagamigahara City, Japan)
- Yuji Sakano
(School of Psychological Science, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, Hokkaido, Japan)
Abstract
Background: Safety behaviour plays an important role in the maintenance of social anxiety disorder (SAD). SAD patients engage in various safety behaviours in social situations in order to decrease the risk of negative evaluations from others. Aims: The present study examined the effect of safety behaviour on the maintenance of anxiety and negative belief in SAD by using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). Methods: Participants were a healthy group (442) and a SAD group (46) who met the SAD criteria for DSM-IV and who had high scores of SAD symptoms. In the assumed maintenance model, independence variables were safety and avoidance behaviour and dependence variables were anxiety and negative belief. Results: This result showed that the SAD group significantly has more high scores than the healthy group in all scales of anxiety, negative belief and avoidance behaviour, expect for safety behaviour. The result of the multiple-group procedure indicated that safety behaviour contributes more strongly to anxiety and negative belief in the SAD group than in the healthy group. Conclusions: It is speculated that the SAD group have a stronger link between safety behaviour and negative belief than the healthy group, whereas frequency of the use of safety behaviour is equivalent between two groups. These results support the findings of previous studies.
Suggested Citation
Isa Okajima & Yoshihiro Kanai & Junwen Chen & Yuji Sakano, 2009.
"Effects of Safety Behaviour On the Maintenance of Anxiety and Negative Belief Social Anxiety Disorder,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 55(1), pages 71-81, January.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:55:y:2009:i:1:p:71-81
DOI: 10.1177/0020764008092191
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:55:y:2009:i:1:p:71-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.