IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v55y2009i1p64-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-Term Outcome of Leucotomy On Behaviour of People With Schizophrenia

Author

Listed:
  • Edward Helmes

    (Department of Psychology, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia, edward.helmes@jcu.edu.au)

  • Varadaraj R. Velamoor

    (Department of Psychiatry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada)

Abstract

Background: Prefrontal leucotomy was widely used from the late 1930s to early 1950s as a treatment for disorders involving obsessive agitation. Comparatively few studies of the enduring behavioural effects of such surgery exist, while data on mortality and cognition have been better reported. Aims: We contrast the psychosocial functioning of older individuals with schizophrenia who had undergone prefrontal leucotomy with two groups of their peers who had not undergone such surgery. Method: A total of 87 individuals (one female) with a mean age of 70.3 years ( SD = 6.84) were evaluated twice 25 months apart using a standardized rating scale. Twenty of the residents, all with schizophrenia, had undergone prefrontal leucotomy approximately 45 years previously. All diagnoses of schizophrenia were confirmed by multiple psychiatrists using DSM-III criteria at the time of the ratings, which were completed by two care staff who knew the residents well. Results: Repeated measures comparisons with schizophrenia and non-schizophrenia patient groups showed no significant differences between the leucotomy and unoperated comparison groups on four of the five Multidimensional Observation Scale for Elderly Subjects (MOSES) scales. Conclusions: These results are consistent with reports of compromised function among individuals who had undergone leucotomy and contrast with some reports of positive changes in behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward Helmes & Varadaraj R. Velamoor, 2009. "Long-Term Outcome of Leucotomy On Behaviour of People With Schizophrenia," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 55(1), pages 64-70, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:55:y:2009:i:1:p:64-70
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764008091681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764008091681
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764008091681?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:55:y:2009:i:1:p:64-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.