IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v55y2009i1p16-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Beliefs About the Treatment of Schizophrenia and Depression in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Érica De Toledo Piza Peluso

    (Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo, pelusoe@terra.com.br)

  • Sérgio Luís Blay

    (Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo)

Abstract

Background: Little is known about public beliefs concerning the treatment of mental disorders in developing countries. Aims: To assess preferences on sources of help and treatment and the perception of prognosis for schizophrenia and depression. Method: A household survey was carried out in 2002 with a probabilistic sample of 1000 individuals, residents of São Paulo city, Brazil, with ages ranging from 18—65. Vignettes in colloquial language describing individuals with schizophrenia and depression (according to DSM-IV and ICD-10) were presented, together with a structured questionnaire with questions about the vignette. Results: Results indicated the same general tendencies for schizophrenia and depression. The public considered the help of lay people and psychologists the most useful. Medical professionals are viewed less favorably. The treatments and activities most recommended are psychotherapy and general activities, such as physical activities and attending church services. Medical treatments are seen as more harmful than helpful. The more important determinants were: identification as mental illness, religion, sex and years of school completed. Prognosis with treatment for both disorders is viewed as favorable. Conclusions: These results may indicate that the public need to receive more information on the full range of treatments options, especially those related to medical treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Érica De Toledo Piza Peluso & Sérgio Luís Blay, 2009. "Public Beliefs About the Treatment of Schizophrenia and Depression in Brazil," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 55(1), pages 16-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:55:y:2009:i:1:p:16-27
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764008092351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764008092351
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764008092351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rebeca Robles-García & Ana Fresán & Carlos Berlanga & Nicolás Martínez, 2013. "Mental illness recognition and beliefs about adequate treatment of a patient with schizophrenia: Association with gender and perception of aggressiveness-dangerousness in a community sample of Mexico ," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(8), pages 811-818, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:55:y:2009:i:1:p:16-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.