IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v54y2008i4p350-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stalking Behaviour By Patients Towards Psychiatrists in a Large Mental Health Organization

Author

Listed:
  • Ronan J. Mcivor

    (Maudsley Hospital and Institute of Psychiatry, London, ronan.mcivor@slam.nhs.uk)

  • Laurence Potter

    (Camden and Islington Mental Health and Social Care Trust, London)

  • Lisa Davies

    (Odgers, Ray & Bernstein, London)

Abstract

Background: Mental health professionals are at greater risk than the general population of being stalked, particularly by patients. Aims: To assess the prevalence of stalking behaviour by patients towards psychiatrists and ascertain patient characteristics. Method: Semi-structured questionnaire to all psychiatrists ( n = 324) working in a large mental health organization. Results: The response rate was 61% ( n = 198). Forty-one doctors (21%) reported having been stalked by patients, the majority being consultants ( n = 31; 76%). No sub-speciality was over-represented. Most stalkers ( n = 24; 59%) were male with a diagnosis of personality disorder (39%) or major mental illness (34%). Duration of stalking ranged from several weeks to 16 years, and most commonly occurred at work. On average, victims experienced two types of inappropriate contact. Physical threats were made against 14 psychiatrists (34%). Conclusions: Stalking by patients towards psychiatrists is common and represents an important occupational risk. Formal training programmes and policy development within healthcare organizations may help manage risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronan J. Mcivor & Laurence Potter & Lisa Davies, 2008. "Stalking Behaviour By Patients Towards Psychiatrists in a Large Mental Health Organization," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 54(4), pages 350-357, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:54:y:2008:i:4:p:350-357
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764008090690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764008090690
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764008090690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:54:y:2008:i:4:p:350-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.