Author
Listed:
- Madeleine J.N. Rijckmans
- Inge M.B. Bongers
- Henk F.L. Garretsen
(Health Care Policy, Tilburg University, Research program TRANZO, Tilburg, The Netherlands)
- Ien A.M. Van de Goor
Abstract
Background: In many Western European countries, there is an increasing request for demand-oriented and demand-driven approaches in health care. In these approaches, the emphasis is on the clients' perspective on healthcare policy and healthcare services. A study was conducted to gain insight into the clients' view of health care. Methods: In 2004 a survey was conducted in the Netherlands among 4250 ambulatory mental health clients, by means of a postal questionnaire. To include clients with different experiences of mental health care, the sample was stratified according to the length of the treatment history. A total of 865 clients responded to the survey. Results: Elements that are found to be important to most clients are that ‘needs are determined in consultation with the client’, that ‘the client is treated in a pleasant manner’ and that ‘the professional informs the client about the possibilities in his/her situation’. Significant differences were found between groups with different background factors: income, education, age, sex and treatment history all had significant correlations. Conclusion: Most clients in ambulatory mental health care appreciate the demand-oriented and demand-driven approaches. However, not all the elements are appreciated in the same manner. In general, clients do not seem to care much about who makes the decisions, but they care much more about the way the decision-making process is carried out. Clients especially value being heard and being involved in the process as a serious party.
Suggested Citation
Madeleine J.N. Rijckmans & Inge M.B. Bongers & Henk F.L. Garretsen & Ien A.M. Van de Goor, 2007.
"A Clients' Perspective on Demand-Oriented and Demand-Driven Health Care,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 53(1), pages 48-62, January.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:53:y:2007:i:1:p:48-62
DOI: 10.1177/0020764006074292
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:53:y:2007:i:1:p:48-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.