IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v52y2006i3p267-277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Bed Requirement Inventory: A Simple Measure To Estimate The Need For A Psychiatric Bed

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Tyrer

    (Tyrer, Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), ClaybrookCentre, London, UK.)

  • Geetha Suryanarayan

    (Central North West London Mental Health NHS Trust, Paterson Centre, London, UK. Ms Bharti Rao, Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), Claybrook Centre, London, UK.)

  • Bharti Rao

    (Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College(Charing Cross Campus), Claybrook Centre, London, UK.)

  • Domenic Cicchetti

    (Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), Claybrook Centre, London, UK.)

  • Naomi Fulop

    (Department of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. John Green)

  • Fiona Roberts

    (Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), Claybrook Centre, London, UK.)

  • Jeremy Slaughter

    (Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College (Charing Cross Campus), Claybrook Centre, London, UK.)

Abstract

Objective: To develop an assessment of bed need that was as little affected by personal biasas possible. Method: The Bed Requirement Inventory (BRI) is an eight-point scale designed to identify the appropriate use of an acute psychiatric bed. This is completed by a member of the ward staff, usually a nurse, and takes 5 minutes to fill in. The reliability, validity and feasibility of using the scale in normal practice were tested in a one-year study, and variations ininappropriate bed use described. Results: The inter-rater reliability of the scale was good (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.63) and a comparison of the need for a psychiatric bed (comparing the BRI score with the judgement of an independent multidisciplinary group of professionals) also showed good agreement (k 1 /4 0.69), suggesting reasonable validity (although when the assessment was made by the named nurse agreement was less good). Results from a year-long survey in two West London hospitals showed that 17% of admissions were inappropriate and 32% had delayed discharge, black Caribbean patients had a significantly higher proportion (25%) of inappropriate admission than others (11%) and those referred from housing charities andhostels had a higher proportion (50%) of inappropriate bed use at some time than other groups(33%). Conclusions: The Bed Requirement Inventory is a quick and reliable method of determiningthe appropriate use of a psychiatric bed and could be of use in estimating local bed needs. Delayeddischarge remains a serious reason for inappropriate bed use in London.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Tyrer & Geetha Suryanarayan & Bharti Rao & Domenic Cicchetti & Naomi Fulop & Fiona Roberts & Jeremy Slaughter, 2006. "The Bed Requirement Inventory: A Simple Measure To Estimate The Need For A Psychiatric Bed," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 52(3), pages 267-277, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:52:y:2006:i:3:p:267-277
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764006067221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764006067221
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764006067221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kingsley Norton, 2004. "Re-Thinking Acute Psychiatric Inpatient Care," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 50(3), pages 274-284, September.
    2. Peter Tyrer & Vanessa Jones & Simon Thompson & Jose Catalan & Ulrike Schmidt & Kate Davidson & Martin Knapp & Obioha C. Ukoumunne, 2003. "Service Variation in Baseline Variables and Prediction of Risk in a Randomised Controlled Trial of Psychological Treatment in Repeated Parasuicide: The Popmact Study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 49(1), pages 58-69, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justine Schneider & Chris Beeley & Kezia Scales & Simon Bailey & Mieke Verhaeghe & Piet Bracke, 2013. "Ward features and stigma experiences of mental health service users in Belgium and England: A replication study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(6), pages 602-608, September.
    2. Peter Tyrer & Ula Nur & Mike Crawford & Saffron Karlsen & Claire MacLean & Bharti Rao & Tony Johnson, 2005. "The Social Functioning Questionnaire: A Rapid and Robust Measure of Perceived Functioning," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 51(3), pages 265-275, September.
    3. Christoph Lauber & Carlos Nordt & Helene Haker & Luis Falcato & Wulf Rössler, 2006. "Community Psychiatry: Results of a Public Opinion Survey," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 52(3), pages 234-242, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:52:y:2006:i:3:p:267-277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.