Author
Listed:
- Rob MacPherson
(Gloucestershire Partnership NHS Trust, UK, rob.macpherson@glospart.nhs.uk)
- Louise Summerfield
(Gloucester Caseload Project, Burleigh House, Gloucester, UK)
- Roger Haynes
(Community Services Manager Burleigh House, Gloucester, UK)
- Mike Slade
(Research Dept., Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK)
- Chris Foy
(Research & Development Unit, Gloucestershire Health Authority, Gloucester, UK)
Abstract
Background and Method: This study surveyed need in a group of psychiatric patients in Gloucester, using a new instrument, the CUES. Keyworkers gave out questionnaires to all patients with psychosis in contact with specialist services. A total of 148 forms were anonymously completed, with a response rate of 37% of the mental health services caseload. Results: 53.5 to 83.2% of patients were satisfied and 61.5 to 89.6% expressed their experiences ‘as good as’ a normative statement across the 16 domains. There was mostly ‘moderate’ agreement between satisfaction and normative questions by Kappa correlations, although responses to normative questions tended to be about 10% higher. Extensive free text responses were subject to content analysis, demonstrating needs across a wide range of health, social and leisure areas, many of which were not directly linked to the adequacy or otherwise of psychiatric treatment. Conclusions: The results imply that the CUES may be of value at an individual level to aid in care planning, and also have some value in aggregated form to benchmark user experiences of services.
Suggested Citation
Rob MacPherson & Louise Summerfield & Roger Haynes & Mike Slade & Chris Foy, 2005.
"The Use of Carers’ and Users’ Expectations of Services (CUES) in an Epidemiological Survey of Need,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 51(1), pages 35-43, March.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:51:y:2005:i:1:p:35-43
DOI: 10.1177/0020764005053268
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:51:y:2005:i:1:p:35-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.