Author
Listed:
- Kaisa Haatainen
(Development Unit 4977, Department of Psychiatry, Kuopio University Hospital, PO Box 1777, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland.kaisa.haatainen@kuh.)
- Antti Tanskanen
(Department of Psychiatry, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.)
- Jari Kylmaä
(Department of Nursing Science, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.)
- Kirsi Honkalampi
- Heli Koivumaa-Honkanen
- Jukka Hintikka
- Heimo Viinamaki
(Department of Psychiatry, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.)
Abstract
Background: Hopelessness is associated with depression and suicidality in clinical as well as in non-clinical populations. However, data on the prevalence of hopelessness and the associated factors in general population are exiguous. Aims: To assess the prevalence and the associated factors of hopelessness in a general population sample. Methods: The random population sample consisted of 1722 subjects. The study questionnaires included the Beck Hopelessness Scale (HS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and Life Satisfaction Scale (LS). Results: Eleven percent of the subjects reported at least moderate hopelessness. A poor financial situation (OR 3.64), poor subjective health (OR 2.87) and reduced working ability (OR 2.67) independently associated with hopelessness. Moreover, the likelihood of moderate or severe hopelessness was significantly increased in subjects dissatisfied with life (OR 5.99), with depression (OR 4.86), with alexithymia (OR 2.37) and with suicidal ideation (OR 1.85). Conclusions: This study demonstrated a moderately high prevalence of hopelessness at the population level. Hopelessness appears to be an important indicator of low subjective well-being in the general population that health care personnel should pay attention to.
Suggested Citation
Kaisa Haatainen & Antti Tanskanen & Jari Kylmaä & Kirsi Honkalampi & Heli Koivumaa-Honkanen & Jukka Hintikka & Heimo Viinamaki, 2004.
"Ftors Associated with Hopelessness: A Population Study,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 50(2), pages 142-152, June.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:50:y:2004:i:2:p:142-152
DOI: 10.1177/0020764004040961
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:50:y:2004:i:2:p:142-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.