IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v50y2004i2p129-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sex Roles and Marital Adjustment in Indian Couples

Author

Listed:
  • Rathna Isaac

    (Department of Clinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, Bangalore, India-560029.rathna_i@hotmail.com)

  • Anisha Shah

    (Department of Clinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.)

Abstract

Background: Marital theorists suggest a link between sex role differences and close relationships for men and women. Marriage is often a context for the activation and expression of sex roles. As marital adjustment is influenced by complementarity of roles between husband and wife, the same could hold true for sex roles as well. Aim: To study the relationship between sex roles and marital adjustment in Indian couples. Methods: The sample consisted of 20 distressed and 20 non-distressed couples from a marital and family therapy centre in the city of Bangalore, India. The measures used included a sociodemographic data sheet, the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, the Bem Sex Role Inventory and a semi-structured interview schedule for gendered experiences. Means, percentages and ANOVAS were used to analyse statistically the data. Content analysis was applied on material from the semistructured interview schedule. Results: The study revealed that: (a) the group as a whole showed greater femininity than masculinity; (b) more non-distressed individuals show high androgyny; (c) androgynous dyads show better marital adjustment; and (d) qualitative analysis suggests a trend for couples to move towards more gender-neutral constructions of marriage. Conclusions: The results indicate a link between androgyny and marital adjustment. The results also suggest the type of match between dyads.

Suggested Citation

  • Rathna Isaac & Anisha Shah, 2004. "Sex Roles and Marital Adjustment in Indian Couples," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 50(2), pages 129-141, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:50:y:2004:i:2:p:129-141
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764004040960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764004040960
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764004040960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:50:y:2004:i:2:p:129-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.