Author
Listed:
- Rosemarie McCabe
(Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Newham Centre for Mental Health, London, E13 8SP, UK.r.mccabe@qmul.ac.uk)
- Stefan Priebe
(Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Newham Centre for Mental Health, UK.)
Abstract
Aims: To review the methods and findings from studies of the therapeutic relationship (TR) in the treatment of severe mental illness. Method: A literature search was conducted to identify all studies that used an operationalised measurement of the TR in the treatment of severe mental illness. Results: Fifteen scales–the majority of which were developed for psychotherapy–and the expressed emotion index have been used. Most scales have acceptable internal, inter-rater and test–retest reliability. As none of the scales has been used in more than five studies, no single scale is widely established in psychiatric research. A more positive relationship consistently predicts a better short-and long-term outcome. It appears that a large global factor accounts for the greatest proportion of the variance in the therapeutic relationship. Conclusions: The therapeutic relationship is a reliable predictor of patient outcome in mainstream psychiatric care. Valid assessments may need to take account of different, specific aspects of the relationship in psychiatric settings such as greater heterogeneity of treatment components and goals, increased variability of setting and the statutory responsibility of the clinician. Methodological progress may require conceptual work to ensure valid assessments of this central element of treatment.
Suggested Citation
Rosemarie McCabe & Stefan Priebe, 2004.
"The Therapeutic Relationship in the Treatment of Severe Mental Illness: A Review of Methods and Findings,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 50(2), pages 115-128, June.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:50:y:2004:i:2:p:115-128
DOI: 10.1177/0020764004040959
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:50:y:2004:i:2:p:115-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.