IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v49y2003i1p27-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discharges of Patients from Public Psychiatric Hospitals in Italy between 1994 and 2000

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara D'Avanzo

    (Laboratory of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry, `Mario Negri' Institute, Via Eritrea 62, 20157 Milan, Italy. barbara@marionegri.itLaboratory of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry of the `Mario Negri' Institute, Milan, Italy.)

  • Angelo Barbato

    (Laboratory of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry of the `Mario Negri' Institute, Milan, Italy.)

  • Corrado Barbui

    (Laboratory of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry of the `Mario Negri' Institute, Milan, Italy.)

  • R. Nadia Battino

    (Laboratory of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry of the `Mario Negri' Institute, Milan, Italy.)

  • Graziella Civenti

    (Regione Lombardia, Assessorato alla Sanità , Milan, Italy.)

  • Lucilla Frattura

Abstract

Background: Psychiatric hospitals in Italy had to be closed under a law dated 1994. Aims: To investigate the discharge of patients from public psychiatric hospitals. Methods: A total of 4492 patients from 22 psychiatric hospitals were described at recruitment and followed during the period 1994-2000. Their characteristics were investigated as determinants of discharge to community residential facilities for psychiatric patients versus other settings. Results: All 22 psychiatric hospitals closed between 1994 and 2000; 678 patients had died, and the remainder were discharged. Of these, 39% went to nursing homes, 29% to community residential facilities for psychiatric patients, 2% joined their family, less than 1% were settled in private independent accommodation, and 29% remained in the psychiatric hospital, although defined as discharged. Ten patients were recorded as missing when still in the psychiatric hospitals, none after discharge. Younger, more educated patients and patients from two of the four regions studied were more likely to be discharged to community residential facilities. Conclusions: The majority of patients were discharged to highly supervised settings. The potential risk of abandonment due to deinstitutionalization was not observed in this population. The wide use of highly supervised settings can be explained by the patients' old age, but different local policies may have affected the discharge process.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara D'Avanzo & Angelo Barbato & Corrado Barbui & R. Nadia Battino & Graziella Civenti & Lucilla Frattura, 2003. "Discharges of Patients from Public Psychiatric Hospitals in Italy between 1994 and 2000," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 49(1), pages 27-34, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:49:y:2003:i:1:p:27-34
    DOI: 10.1177/002076400304900104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002076400304900104
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002076400304900104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbara D'Avanzo & Lucilla Frattura & Corrado Barbui & Graziella Civenti & Benedetto Saraceno, 1999. "The Qualyop Project 1: Monitoring the Dismantlement of Italian Public Psychiatric Hospitals Characteristics of Patients Scheduled for Discharge," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 45(2), pages 79-92, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christoph Lauber & Carlos Nordt & Helene Haker & Luis Falcato & Wulf Rössler, 2006. "Community Psychiatry: Results of a Public Opinion Survey," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 52(3), pages 234-242, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:49:y:2003:i:1:p:27-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.