Author
Listed:
- T. Shibre
- D. Kebede
(Department of Community Health, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia)
- A. Alem
(Department of Psychiatry, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia)
- A. Negash
(Department of Community Health, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia)
- S. Kibreab
- A. Fekadu
- D. Fekadu
(Department of Psychiatry, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia)
- L. Jacobsson
(Division of Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden)
- G. Kullgren
(Division of Psychiatry, Dept Clinical Sciences, Umeå University, SE-901 85 Umeå, Sweden. Gunnar.kullgren@psychiat.umu.se)
Abstract
Background: Detecting cases with psychiatric disorders in the general population is costly and it is not clear which is the method of choice for community surveys in low-income countries. Aim: To compare the performance of a standardized diagnostic layman interview instrument-the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1) versus the Key Informant method in identifying cases with schizophrenia and major affective disorders in a community survey. Method: Both screening methods were tested against an expert interview the Schedule for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN 2.1) in a rural district in Ethiopia with 25,632 inhabitants. Result: CIDI identified 524 and key informants 192 individuals as probable cases who were invited for a further SCAN interview. Seventy-two individuals were identified by both methods. Of those identified as probable cases by either method, a total of 481 volunteered the SCAN interviews. The Key Informant method alone detected more cases of schizophrenia, 59 vs. 29 for CIDI, whereas CIDI alone detected more cases of affective disorders, 45 vs. 30. Key informants performed better in detecting chronic cases. Conclusion: For community surveys, which aim at identifying cases with major mental disorders in low-income countries like Ethiopia, the combined use of both CIDI and the Key Informant method is recommended.
Suggested Citation
T. Shibre & D. Kebede & A. Alem & A. Negash & S. Kibreab & A. Fekadu & D. Fekadu & L. Jacobsson & G. Kullgren, 2002.
"An Evaluation of Two Screening Methods to Identify Cases with Schizophrenia and Affective Disorders in a Community Survey in Rural Ethiopia,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 48(3), pages 200-208, September.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:48:y:2002:i:3:p:200-208
DOI: 10.1177/002076402128783244
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Hanlon, Charlotte & Whitley, Rob & Wondimagegn, Dawit & Alem, Atalay & Prince, Martin, 2009.
"Postnatal mental distress in relation to the sociocultural practices of childbirth: An exploratory qualitative study from Ethiopia,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1211-1219, October.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:48:y:2002:i:3:p:200-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.