IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v47y2001i2p1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mental Health Act Assessments: Does a Community Treatment Team Make a Difference?

Author

Listed:
  • Louise M. Dunn

Abstract

There is an extensive body of research into home treatment for acute mental illness, but this is the first one to examine any association with Mental Health Act Assessments. It examines the question of whether there is any impact of a home treatment team on the numbers and circumstances of Mental Health Act Assess ments in its area. The 1983 Mental Health Act created the role of the Approved Social Worker, among whose duties is that of ensuring that any disposal is the least restrictive possible. For this duty to be carried out meaningfully, as wide a range of alternatives as possible needs to be available. The move from institutional to community care for the mentally ill which has been the 'big idea' of recent decades has given rise to intense interest in home treatment for acute mental illness, which can offer a potential alternative at a time of crisis for ASWs and thus patients. This study examined over 200 reports written by ASWs following Mental Health Act Assessments in the two areas, and it was found that the home treatment team appeared to have an impact. it was hypothesised that such a team might have an effect on the sorts people presenting for assessment. It was conduded that area with the team had an absolute and a relative reduction in the numbers of assessments. It was also found that there was a decrease in the likelihood of detention under Section 3 of the Act for people living in the area of the team. Finally it was found that the involvement of the team in an assessment reduced the likelihood of a Section 3 decision even further. Analysis indicated that the home treatment team was able to absorb some of the people, mainly male, who were suffering from a psychotic illness, and who were inclined to re-present on more than one occasion.

Suggested Citation

  • Louise M. Dunn, 2001. "Mental Health Act Assessments: Does a Community Treatment Team Make a Difference?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 47(2), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:47:y:2001:i:2:p:1-19
    DOI: 10.1177/002076400104700201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002076400104700201
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002076400104700201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoult, John & Rosen, Alan & Reynolds, Ingrid, 1984. "Community orientated treatment compared to psychiatric hospital orientated treatment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 18(11), pages 1005-1010, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elzbieta Slupczynska-Kossobudzka & Ludmila Boguszewska, 1999. "Effects of Community Mobile Team Intervention in the Drewnica Hospital Catchment Area. 1. Patient Outcome," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 45(3), pages 207-215, September.
    2. Yu, Yu & Liu, Zi-Wei & Li, Tong-Xin & Li, Yi-Lu & Xiao, Shui-Yuan & Tebes, Jacob Kraemer, 2020. "Test of the stress process model of family caregivers of people living with schizophrenia in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    3. Roberto Mezzina & Daniela Vidoni, 1995. "Beyond the Mental Hospital: Crisis Intervention and Continuity of Care in Trieste. A Four Year Follow-Up Study in a Community Mental Health Centre," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 41(1), pages 1-20, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:47:y:2001:i:2:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.