IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v46y2000i2p110-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of the Workshop Behavior Checklist: a Scale for Assessing Work Performance of People with Severe Mental Illness

Author

Listed:
  • Hector Tsang
  • Ip Yee Chiu

Abstract

The Workshop Behavior Checklist is a standardized assessment instrument to assess the work performance of people with severe mental illness using the situational assessment approach. It is modified from the Behavior Identification Form developed by the Material Development Center. The modification process was conducted by enlisting input from mental health professionals ( n = 150) and potential employers of discharged patients with mental illness ( n = 31) by ques tionnaires specially designed for this purpose. The results of these questionnaires were then analyzed by an expert panel consisting of 10 therapists and one psychiatrist working in relevant fields. Altogether 14 items in general behaviors, vocational behaviors, and social behaviors were selected. In addition, a new version of the checklist together with its rating guidelines were designed. Explora tory factor analysis (n = 112) shows that all 14 items fit well into a four-factor model explaining 67.2% of total variance, which is in line with the original design of the revised checklist. Cronbach alpha analysis shows that the revised checklist has acceptable to very good internal consistency (.51 to .84) and intraclass correlation coefficients indicate that it has good to excellent inter-rater (.57 to .81) and test-retest (.86 to .94) reliability. Clinical implications and further research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hector Tsang & Ip Yee Chiu, 2000. "Development and Validation of the Workshop Behavior Checklist: a Scale for Assessing Work Performance of People with Severe Mental Illness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 46(2), pages 110-121, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:46:y:2000:i:2:p:110-121
    DOI: 10.1177/002076400004600204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002076400004600204
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002076400004600204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:46:y:2000:i:2:p:110-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.