IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v45y1999i1p1-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Not Listening To Patients - the Use and Misuse of Patient Satisfaction Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J. Crawford
  • Anthony S. Kessel

Abstract

Demand for the development of health services that are responsive to the views of users has led to a growing interest in the measurement of patient satisfaction. Initial reluctance to seek the views of users of mental health services focused on a debate about whether or not mentally disordered patients were able to make 'valid' comments about their treatment. More recently the development of questionnaires that claim to 'reliably measure' the views of patients have coincided with a greater acceptance of the role that such studies can play. However, it is argued that the use of these quantitative and often simplistic methods underestimate the dissatisfaction of many patients. Further exploration of the differing expectations of users and providers of services and a degree of willingness in both parties to change is required if services are to be developed that better meet the needs of patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J. Crawford & Anthony S. Kessel, 1999. "Not Listening To Patients - the Use and Misuse of Patient Satisfaction Studies," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 45(1), pages 1-6, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:45:y:1999:i:1:p:1-6
    DOI: 10.1177/002076409904500101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002076409904500101
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002076409904500101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:45:y:1999:i:1:p:1-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.