IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v39y1993i4p255-265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-Abortion Perceptions: a Comparison of Self-Identified Distressed and Nondistressed Populations

Author

Listed:
  • G. Kam Congleton

    (United States Army, Fort Jackson, South Carolina, USA)

  • Lawrence G. Calhoun

    (Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA)

Abstract

This study investigated the experiences of 25 women who described themselves as responding in an emotionally distressed manner to abortion and a comparison group of 25 women reporting more relieving/neutral responses. Current and initial stress response to the abortion, general mental health, and demographic characteristics were assessed quantitatively, and interviews explored subjective perceptions. The distress group had significantly higher scores on initial stress response and religiosity, were more often currently affiliated with conservative churches, and reported lower degree of social support and confidence in the abortion decision. Qualitatively, 48% of the distress group recalled experiencing feelings of loss immediately post-abortion, in contrast to none in the nondistress group. Both groups identified post-abortion "catalytic" events, such as subsequent childbirth, that affected responses to the abortion over time.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Kam Congleton & Lawrence G. Calhoun, 1993. "Post-Abortion Perceptions: a Comparison of Self-Identified Distressed and Nondistressed Populations," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 39(4), pages 255-265, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:39:y:1993:i:4:p:255-265
    DOI: 10.1177/002076409303900402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002076409303900402
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002076409303900402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:39:y:1993:i:4:p:255-265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.