IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v36y1990i4p280-290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Mental Health Care: Clients' Perceptions of Services and an Evaluation of a Voluntary Agency Support Scheme

Author

Listed:
  • Liz Handyside

    (The Health Education Centre, The Chapel, Bortham Park, York YO3 7BY)

  • Bob Heyman

    (Department of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Newcastle-upon-Tyne Polytechnic, Northumberland Road, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 8ST)

Abstract

A questionnaire assessment of mental health and of perceptions of formal care was conducted with a sample of clients before they received a voluntary agency mental health intervention in addition to normal community psychiatric and social services. The assessment was repeated three months later. A matched control group who received only the normal services were also assessed twice over a period of three months. Both groups improved significantly on the mental health measure over the three months and there was little difference between the treatment and control group. Clients in the voluntary agency group were less satisfied with community psychiatric services and may have chosen the voluntary agency as an alternative source of help. Women in both groups showed less improvement in measured mental health than men. Community Psychiatric Nurses (CPNs) were seen more than social workers, psychoiogists and psychiatrists. Contacts with CPNs and social workers were rated most favourably.

Suggested Citation

  • Liz Handyside & Bob Heyman, 1990. "Community Mental Health Care: Clients' Perceptions of Services and an Evaluation of a Voluntary Agency Support Scheme," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 36(4), pages 280-290, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:36:y:1990:i:4:p:280-290
    DOI: 10.1177/002076409003600406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002076409003600406
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002076409003600406?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:36:y:1990:i:4:p:280-290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.